2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal Sobolev regularity for solutions of elliptic equations in infinite dimensional Banach spaces endowed with a weighted Gaussian measure

Abstract: Let X be a separable Banach space endowed with a non-degenerate centered Gaussian measure µ. The associated Cameron-Martin space is denoted by H. Let ν = e −U µ, where U : X → R is a sufficiently regular convex and continuous function. In this paper we are interested in the W 2,2 regularity of the weak solutions of elliptic equations of the type λu − Lν u = f, where λ > 0, f ∈ L 2 (X, ν) and Lν is the self-adjoint operator associated with the quadratic form (ψ, ϕ) → X

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We simply realized that the continuity hypothesis was not needed. This implies that in the case Ω = X the results of this paper are also a generalization of the results in [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We simply realized that the continuity hypothesis was not needed. This implies that in the case Ω = X the results of this paper are also a generalization of the results in [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…See [12, Section 3] for more details and [9] and [6,Section 12.4] for a treatment of the classical Moreau-Yosida approximations in Hilbert spaces, which are different from the one defined in (4.3). In the following proposition we recall some results contained in [12,Section 3].…”
Section: A Property Of the Moreau-yosida Approximations Along Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover the fact that U belongs to D 1,q (X, γ) for any q ∈ [1, ∞) allows us to conclude that the operator D H : FC 1 b (X) → L p (X, ν; H) is closable in L p (X, ν), p ∈ (1, ∞) and we may define the space D 1,p (X, ν), p > 1, as the domain of its closure (still denoted by D H ). In a similar way we can define D 2,p (X, ν), p ∈ (1, ∞) (for more details see [12] and [22]). The Gaussian integration by parts formula X D i f dγ = 1 √ λi X x, v i f dγ, which holds true for any f ∈ FC 1 b (X) and i ∈ N, yields that…”
Section: Assumptions and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with ψ 1 ∈ D 1,2 (X, ν ε k ) and ψ 2 ∈ D(L ε k ) = D 2,2 (X, ν ε k ) (see [12,Theorem 6.2] for the characterisation of the domain of D(L ε k )). Theorem 2.8 guarantees that, for every t ≥ 0, the function u ε k ,n (t, ·) belongs to FC 3 b (X) and, as consequence, that G is differentiable in (0, t).…”
Section: Pointwise Gradient Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%