2012 IEEE 9th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS 2012) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/mass.2012.6502546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing data preservation in intermittently connected sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since no base station is available, they design cooperative distributed storage systems specifically for disconnected operations of sensor networks, to improve the utilization of the network's data storage capacity. The other line of research instead takes an algorithmic approach by focusing on the hardness of the problems and the optimality of their solutions [11,25,27,28,34]. Tang et al [25,28] address the energy-efficient data redistribution problem in data-intensive sensor networks, and propose efficient centralized and distributed algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since no base station is available, they design cooperative distributed storage systems specifically for disconnected operations of sensor networks, to improve the utilization of the network's data storage capacity. The other line of research instead takes an algorithmic approach by focusing on the hardness of the problems and the optimality of their solutions [11,25,27,28,34]. Tang et al [25,28] address the energy-efficient data redistribution problem in data-intensive sensor networks, and propose efficient centralized and distributed algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al [25,28] address the energy-efficient data redistribution problem in data-intensive sensor networks, and propose efficient centralized and distributed algorithms. Hou et al [11] and Takahashi et al [25] study how to maximize the minimum remaining energy of the nodes that finally store the data, in order to store the data for long period of time. Xue et al [34] consider that sensory data from different source nodes have different importance, and study how to preserve data with highest importance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the techniques focus on reducing the access cost [8,28,29,35] or battery consumption [24], and are therefore not suitable towards achieving K-Availability. Only line of research that focuses on enhancing data availability in sensor networks is called data redistribution or data preservation [10,27,30,31,34], which address how to preserve data inside sensor networks by tackling either storage-or energy-depletion induced data loss. Tang et al [30,31] study energy-efficient data redistribution in sensor networks wherein data is moved from nodes with highly loaded storage space to nodes with surplus storage, while minimizing the total energy consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overcoming the obstacle of data loss and preserving data until next uploading opportunity is therefore an important problem. In our previous research, we have addressed storage and energy depletion induced data loss [10,27,30,31,34]. However, unlike storage and energy depletion, sensor node hardware failure is unpredictable and thus can not be alleviated directly using similar techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution to avoid such data loss is simple: the overflow data is offloaded to other nodes with available storages (referred to as storage nodes). 1 Different data offloading techniques have been proposed with the goals of either minimizing the total energy consumption during data offloading [17], or maximizing the minimum remaining energy of storage nodes to prolong network lifetime [8], or offloading the most useful information considering data could have different priorities [21]. However, these techniques did not address the second level of data overflow, which is overall storage overflow explained below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%