2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.19.034084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing Focus Quality Through Random Media with Discrete-Phase-Sampling Lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imaging techniques such as phase conjugation, inversed filtering, together with prior knowledge of the acoustic environment, are also viable routes for improving the outcomes 32 . Second, better results are expected if the phase modulation is of a finer phase sampling rate, e.g., a four-phase modualtion 33 . However, this is at the cost of longer optimization time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging techniques such as phase conjugation, inversed filtering, together with prior knowledge of the acoustic environment, are also viable routes for improving the outcomes 32 . Second, better results are expected if the phase modulation is of a finer phase sampling rate, e.g., a four-phase modualtion 33 . However, this is at the cost of longer optimization time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the grey line shown in figure 9(c), the intensity distribution of the transverse electric field at the focus point significantly deviates from the ideal Gaussian distribution, leading to the poor focusing quality of 1.83 × 10 5 , just 29% of the ideal values. Notably, this focus field distribution is calculated numerically based on the Huygens-Fresnel principle and employs the asymptotic form to simplify computations [58]. Focusing efficiency (FE) is defined as the ratio of optical intensity at the focal spot to the input intensity [19].…”
Section: Enhanced Beam Focusing Via Inverse Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct optimization of FE can mislocate the peak energy positions, leading to a distorted focal point. Therefore, our approach advances beyond mere FE optimization by improving the contrast between the focal point and its surroundings, thereby elevating focusing quality (FQ), defined as [58]: Where, ( ) I x is the field distribution in the focal plane, D is the radius of the device. Therefore, the inverse design method aims to maximize these two parameters, defined as FOM FE FQ.…”
Section: Enhanced Beam Focusing Via Inverse Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of various protocols can significantly impact the overall quality of the constructed field. [30] Therefore, both an efficient algorithm and a well-defined evaluation method are highly required to optimize the phase distribution on the emitting surface, ultimately maximizing the quality of OAM beams, which thereby leads to the enhanced performance in constructing the twisted ultrasonic motor and opens up new avenues for technological advancements in OAM-based applications.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aisy202300255mentioning
confidence: 99%