2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2014.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing the conditional overlap in business surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change in industry stratification using the new classifications meant that currently sampled businesses from several different strata in the old design formed the initial sample in a new stratum. If there was complete freedom to choose which businesses to include in the sample, then it would be possible to maximise the overlap appropriately using optimisation methods (see Mach et al 2006, Johnson et al 2012and Schiopu-Kratina et al 2014 for some examples of suitable methods); similarly, if particular surveys were restricted to parts of the PRN line (as in the Swedish system SAMU, see Lindblom 2003), the problem would be simplified. But in the ONS there are no restrictions to parts of the line for particular surveys, and the sample selection is managed by the PRN rotation system in the IDBR, so it was important to retain the existing system.…”
Section: Survey Redesignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change in industry stratification using the new classifications meant that currently sampled businesses from several different strata in the old design formed the initial sample in a new stratum. If there was complete freedom to choose which businesses to include in the sample, then it would be possible to maximise the overlap appropriately using optimisation methods (see Mach et al 2006, Johnson et al 2012and Schiopu-Kratina et al 2014 for some examples of suitable methods); similarly, if particular surveys were restricted to parts of the PRN line (as in the Swedish system SAMU, see Lindblom 2003), the problem would be simplified. But in the ONS there are no restrictions to parts of the line for particular surveys, and the sample selection is managed by the PRN rotation system in the IDBR, so it was important to retain the existing system.…”
Section: Survey Redesignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the category of non-PRN schemes, methods following to Keytz (1951), Kish and Scott (1971) or Matei and Tille ´(2005b) and methods based on mathematical programming (e.g., Raj 1968;Arthnari and Dodge 1981;Causey et al 1985;Ernst and Ikeda 1995;Ernst 1996Ernst , 1998Ernst and Paben 2002;Mach et al 2006;Matei and Skinner 2009;Schiopu-Kratina et al 2014) may be included.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%