“…Here, alternative genetically encoded platforms have made more progress . For example, chemigenetic sensors for Na + have been reported, which combine a synthetic crown ether-based Na + -binding domain with a fluorophore (synthetic or protein) and a tag protein that can be used for cellular targeting. , Applications of chemigenetic sensors have primarily focused on mammalian cell lines and primary cells, however, and efforts to expand their use to plants, bacteria, and other organisms where the synthetic component would need to be efficiently delivered have been limited. , In the realm of transition metals, there are many Zn 2+ and several Cu + and/or Cu 2+ sensors, utilizing a few different binding domains, but there have been limited efforts in optimizing the dynamic range of these indicators compared to the Ca 2+ family (Tables and ). Among the other most prominent transition metals, there is one sensor family introduced each for Mn, Co, Ni, and Mo, but none for Fe. − The development of sensors for some of these metal ions must overcome their rankings in the Irving–Williams series, which orders the first-row divalent transition metals according to the stabilities of their metal–ligand complexes (Mn 2+ < Fe 2+ < Co 2+ < Ni 2+ < Cu 2+ > Zn 2+ ) .…”