1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(98)00115-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum cuts: Improvements and local algorithmic analogues of the Edwards-Erdős inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a graph always admits such a partition that can be found in polynomial time. On the other hand, those locally optimal cuts can be rather far from globally optimal ones (even when local vertex switching is allowed in a much wider sense), as proved in [21].…”
Section: Co-satisfactory Partitionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, a graph always admits such a partition that can be found in polynomial time. On the other hand, those locally optimal cuts can be rather far from globally optimal ones (even when local vertex switching is allowed in a much wider sense), as proved in [21].…”
Section: Co-satisfactory Partitionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Classical guarantees include b(G) ≥ m 2 + 1 8 ( √ 8m + 1−1) (Edwards [5]) and, for connected graphs, b(G) ≥ m 2 + 1 4 (n − 1) (conjectured by Erdős [7] and proved by Edwards [6]). Bylka, Idzik, and Tuza [3] strengthened the Edwards-Erdős bound to b(G) ≥ m 2 + 1 2 2t−1 2t (n − 1) when G is connected and has no odd cycle of length less than 2t. Furthermore, this is sharp (using graphs whose blocks are (2t + 1)-cycles), and there is a linear-time algorithm to find a bipartite subgraph this big.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An elementary heuristic approach to finding large bipartite subgraphs is to start with an arbitrary vertex partition and then make local improvements. Bylka, Idzik, and Tuza [3] found a local switching algorithm that guarantees a cut as big as the bound of Edwards [5]. A simple type of local improvement is to move a vertex having more incident edges to vertices in its own set than in the other set; moving it to the other set increases the size of the cut.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other polynomial time Max-Cut approximation algorithms can be found in [2,3]. Because of the high proven performance guarantee of (GW), we focus on comparing our algorithm against it.…”
Section: Algorithm (Gw): the Goemans-williamson Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G ∈ G with n ≥ 2, let ε > 0, and let u be a minimizer of f + ε : V → R as in(2). Then u is not a constant function.Proof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%