2021
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2021.1908555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum entropy and empirical likelihood in length-biased setting: a comparison study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to implement the full likelihood, one usually assumes a uniform distribution for 𝜏. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] This special setting, called "length-biased sampling" have been considered extensively in biostatistics, epidemiology, and econometrics, but not in field reliability analyses.…”
Section: Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to implement the full likelihood, one usually assumes a uniform distribution for 𝜏. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] This special setting, called "length-biased sampling" have been considered extensively in biostatistics, epidemiology, and econometrics, but not in field reliability analyses.…”
Section: Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some case, it is reasonable to consider the “full likelihood” of T and, which contains more information than the conditional likelihood. However, to implement the full likelihood, one usually assumes a uniform distribution for τ 30–36 . This special setting, called “length‐biased sampling” have been considered extensively in biostatistics, epidemiology, and econometrics, but not in field reliability analyses.…”
Section: Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%