2021
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2020.3044379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Calibration of Stochastic Multipath Radio Channel Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we propose to carry out approximate likelihood-based inference for the model parameters. As in [23], we apply Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques to handle the computational problems arising from the analytically intractable likelihood function. In the context of the Turin model [1], [23] suggested to obtain estimates by maximizing a Monte Carlo estimate of the likelihood function, integrating out the unobserved multipath components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose to carry out approximate likelihood-based inference for the model parameters. As in [23], we apply Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques to handle the computational problems arising from the analytically intractable likelihood function. In the context of the Turin model [1], [23] suggested to obtain estimates by maximizing a Monte Carlo estimate of the likelihood function, integrating out the unobserved multipath components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used to calibrate the Turin model [1], the Saleh-Valenzuela (S-V) model [2] and the polarized propagation graph (PG) model [15]. These calibration methods rely either on a Monte Carlo approximation of the likelihood [16], [17], the method of moments [18], [19], or a summarybased likelihood-free inference framework [20]- [23] such as approximate Bayesian computation (ABC). First developed in the field of population genetics in 1997, ABC has since become a popular method for calibrating models with intractable likelihoods in various fields, see [24] for an overview.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First developed in the field of population genetics in 1997, ABC has since become a popular method for calibrating models with intractable likelihoods in various fields, see [24] for an overview. The main drawback of the calibration methods [17]- [19] is their reliance on equations that explicitly link the moments of the summaries with the model parameters, or in case of [16], on the model-specific point process. These methods should therefore be re-derived for each new model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used to calibrate the Turin model [1], the Saleh-Valenzuela (S-V) model [2] and the polarized propagation graph (PG) model [15]. These calibration methods rely either on a Monte Carlo approximation of the likelihood [16], [17], the method of moments [18], [19], or a summarybased likelihood-free inference framework [20]- [22] such as approximate Bayesian computation (ABC). First developed in the field of population genetics in 1997, ABC has since become a popular method for calibrating models with intractable likelihoods in various fields, see [23] for an overview.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First developed in the field of population genetics in 1997, ABC has since become a popular method for calibrating models with intractable likelihoods in various fields, see [23] for an overview. The main drawback of the calibration methods [17]- [19] is their reliance on equations that explicitly link the moments of the summaries with the model parameters, or in case of [16], on the model-specific point process. These methods should therefore be re-derived for each new model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%