2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9892.00238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Estimates of a Class of One‐Dimensional Stochastic Differential Equation Models From Discrete Data

Abstract: The problem of computing the maximum likelihood estimate of the parameters of a speci®c class of stochastic differential equation (SDE) models with linear drift whose sample paths are observed at discrete time points is considered. This estimate is obtained as in Cleur and Manfredi (1999) by discretizing the explicit expressions for the estimates which maximize the likelihood function in continuous time, by discretizing the likelihood function through a quadrature approximation before maximizing it, and by max… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the whole trajectory of the diffusion can be observed, then the parameter estimation problem is relatively simple, but of practical contemporary interest is work in which an approximate estimator, using only information gleaned from the underlying process in discrete time, is able to do as well as an estimator that uses continuously gathered information. Several methods have been employed to construct good estimators for this challenging question of discretely observed diffusions; among these methods, we refer to numerical approximation of the likelihood function (see [1,5,32]), martingale estimating functions (see [6]), indirect statistical inference (see [16]), the Bayesian approach (see [15]), some sharp probabilistic bounds on the convergence of estimators in [7], and [10,12,31] for particular situations. We mention the survey [36] for parameter estimation in discrete cases, further details in [21,25] and the book [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the whole trajectory of the diffusion can be observed, then the parameter estimation problem is relatively simple, but of practical contemporary interest is work in which an approximate estimator, using only information gleaned from the underlying process in discrete time, is able to do as well as an estimator that uses continuously gathered information. Several methods have been employed to construct good estimators for this challenging question of discretely observed diffusions; among these methods, we refer to numerical approximation of the likelihood function (see [1,5,32]), martingale estimating functions (see [6]), indirect statistical inference (see [16]), the Bayesian approach (see [15]), some sharp probabilistic bounds on the convergence of estimators in [7], and [10,12,31] for particular situations. We mention the survey [36] for parameter estimation in discrete cases, further details in [21,25] and the book [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDEs are more realistic than traditional approaches in longitudinal data analysis and other applications, but wider acceptance has been hampered by mathematical and computational complexity. Linear SDEs allow explicit solutions, and are suitable for compartmental and other models (Cleur 2000, Kristensen et al 2005, Klim et al 2009, Favetto and Samson 2010, Cuenod et al 2011, Driver et al 2017, Seber and Wild 2003). However, they may not be appropriate in more general situations.…”
Section: Furnivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.3) and pharmacokinetics (Kristensen et al 2005, Klim et al 2009, Donnet and Samson 2013, and are increasingly used in fields like econometrics (Paige and Allen 2010, Bu et al 2010, 2016, animal growth (Lv and Pitchford 2007, Strathe et al 2009, Filipe et al 2010, oncology (Sen 1989, Favetto and, and forestry (García 1983, Broad and Lynch 2006, Batho and García 2014. Other applications include Artzrouni and Reneke (1990), Cleur (2000), Driver et al (2017). In particular, deterministic growth curves are commonly fitted to repeated measurements assuming that observation error is the only source of randomness (Davidian and Giltinan 2003), but an SDE growth model can be more realistic (Hotelling 1927, Donnet et al 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples and comparisons of these techniques can be found in [7,8]. Another way of constructing the likelihood for discrete observations utilizes the Markov property of solutions to (1):…”
Section: Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%