2015 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/isie.2015.7281667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum likelihood frequency estimation in smart grid applications

Abstract: International audienceThis paper focuses on the estimation of the fundamental frequency in balanced three-phase power systems. Specifically, we propose a Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) that exploits the multidimensional nature of electrical signals. For perfectly sinusoidal signals, we show that the MLE can be expressed according to the periodogram of the instantaneous positive component. For harmonic signals, we demonstrate that the MLE can be approximated by a cumulated periodogram of the zero, positive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the same way, if the fundamental component of the three-phase current contains an unbalanced part, this part is entirely projected onto i − (t) and/or i 0 (t) depending on the type of unbalance. This result is to be related to the one mentioned in [17], where it is shown that for perfectly balanced three-phase signals the Cramer Rao Bound of the frequency estimator is three times lower for the positive-sequence ISC than for single phase approaches.…”
Section: Snr Improvementsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the same way, if the fundamental component of the three-phase current contains an unbalanced part, this part is entirely projected onto i − (t) and/or i 0 (t) depending on the type of unbalance. This result is to be related to the one mentioned in [17], where it is shown that for perfectly balanced three-phase signals the Cramer Rao Bound of the frequency estimator is three times lower for the positive-sequence ISC than for single phase approaches.…”
Section: Snr Improvementsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The current signal formulation given in Eq. (16) can be rewritten in a more compact form using phasor notations, leading to Equation (17).…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%