2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum mean principal stress criterion for three-dimensional brittle fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be stated that the main reason of this discrepancy is the nonlinear behavior of the load‐displacement curve of the epoxy resin under out‐of‐plane loading, which is not considered by the mentioned fracture criteria. This discrepancy was also reported by various researchers such as Ayatollahi and Saboori, Wang et al, and Richard et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be stated that the main reason of this discrepancy is the nonlinear behavior of the load‐displacement curve of the epoxy resin under out‐of‐plane loading, which is not considered by the mentioned fracture criteria. This discrepancy was also reported by various researchers such as Ayatollahi and Saboori, Wang et al, and Richard et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthre explanations about the mentioned criteria have been presented in Wang et al The fracture limit surfaces illustrated based on the different criteria are shown in Figure . If the total SIF related to a cracked sample reaches this fracture limit, unstable crack growth will immediately occur.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the lack of complete information on the properties, an attempt is made to use limited available data to assess the relative strength of the analyzed reflectors with this approach. It must be noted that the crack propagation theories for the multi-dimensional state of stress are under constant development and there is no consensus on which one of them should generally be used [94], especially for materials as rarely used as beryllium. It is worth noting that the FE analysis in COMSOL does not rely on UTS and UCS.…”
Section: Figure 341 Stress Intensity Modification Factor For Pressumentioning
confidence: 99%