2014 11th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ecticon.2014.6839750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum power point tracking in wind energy conversion systems using tracking control system based on fuzzy controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P&O and ORB algorithms come under sensorless methods and are cheaper and more reliable as they do not require any mechanical sensors, but they cannot track the exact MPPT under rapid wind fluctuations. The hybrid and intelligent algorithms are more accurate, robust and are advantageous than the above two categories of methods but they are do not comply with the constraints of simplicity and cost (Agarwal et al, 2010; Balasundar et al, 2015; Dalala et al, 2013; Haque et al, 2010; Heydari and Smedley, 2015; Huang et al, 2015; Mahdavian et al, 2014; Nasiri et al, 2014; Rahim, 2014; Singh and Chandra, 2011; Tan and Islam, 2004; Wei et al, 2016).…”
Section: Proposed Mppt Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…P&O and ORB algorithms come under sensorless methods and are cheaper and more reliable as they do not require any mechanical sensors, but they cannot track the exact MPPT under rapid wind fluctuations. The hybrid and intelligent algorithms are more accurate, robust and are advantageous than the above two categories of methods but they are do not comply with the constraints of simplicity and cost (Agarwal et al, 2010; Balasundar et al, 2015; Dalala et al, 2013; Haque et al, 2010; Heydari and Smedley, 2015; Huang et al, 2015; Mahdavian et al, 2014; Nasiri et al, 2014; Rahim, 2014; Singh and Chandra, 2011; Tan and Islam, 2004; Wei et al, 2016).…”
Section: Proposed Mppt Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To operate the Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) at an optimum power extraction point, a Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithm should be implemented. Several MPPT algorithms have been proposed in literature (Agarwal et al, 2010; Balasundar et al, 2015; Dalala et al, 2013; Haque et al, 2010; Heydari and Smedley, 2015; Huang et al, 2015; Mahdavian et al, 2014; Nasiri et al, 2014; Rahim, 2014; Singh and Chandra, 2011; Tan and Islam, 2004; Wei et al, 2016). However, choosing an appropriate MPPT algorithm for a particular case requires sufficient proficiency with each because each algorithm has its own merits and demerits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since only part of total power, approximately 25%, is flowing through power electronic converter, thus the size and cost of the converter are reduced meaningfully [28,29]. The need for sliding ring and brush are among the drawbacks of this system, increasing construction and maintenance cost [30]. This type of WECS can potentially reduce the oscillations introduced by wind speed variations.…”
Section: Wind Energy Conversion Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To operate the WECS at an optimum power extraction point, a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm should be implemented. Several MPPT algorithms have been proposed in literatures (Blaabjerg et al, 2006;Haque et al, 2010;Heydari and Smedley, 2015;Mahdavian et al, 2014). Generally, the MPPT algorithms can be related into three major types: tip speed ratio (TSR) control, Perturb and Observe (P&O) control, and optimum relation predicated (ORB) control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%