2018
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2018.2843338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Sum Rate of Slotted Aloha With Successive Interference Cancellation

Abstract: This is a sequel of our previous work [8] on characterization of maximum sum rate of slotted Aloha networks.By extending the analysis to incorporate the capacity-achieving receiver structure, Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC), this paper aims to identify the rate loss due to random access. Specifically, two representative SIC receivers are considered, i.e, ordered SIC where packets are decoded in a descending order of their received power, and unordered SIC where packets are decoded in a random order.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It simply indicates that collisions are correctly received with a probability that is inversely proportional to the size of the collision. Similar reception models in different contexts have been proposed in the literature using exponential functions, particularly in the power capture domain and successive interference cancellation systems (see [22]). The exact solution obtained by exhaustive search, the optimum solution from the determinant equation set to zero in (9), and the suboptimal solution in (16) are shown in the two figures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It simply indicates that collisions are correctly received with a probability that is inversely proportional to the size of the collision. Similar reception models in different contexts have been proposed in the literature using exponential functions, particularly in the power capture domain and successive interference cancellation systems (see [22]). The exact solution obtained by exhaustive search, the optimum solution from the determinant equation set to zero in (9), and the suboptimal solution in (16) are shown in the two figures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Let us substitute the asymmetrical determinant elements in (22) into the proposed suboptimal solution in (16). This leads to:…”
Section: Symmetrical Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They modeled the system into a MISO-IC model, and proposed a new method to characterize different rate-tuples. The used IM techniques of above studies are all interference shaping, while the most popular technique which can realize the interference exploitation is the Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) [19]- [21]. When using SIC, the receiver can receive several transmitters' data simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughput maximization with random arrivals in both coordinated and uncoordinated setups with the same rate assignment to all the users is studied in [23], and coding schemes for massive random access are studied in [24]. In addition, in [25], the authors characterize the maximum sum-rate of slotted ALOHA with successive interference cancellation (SIC), where optimum activity probability and encoding rate are obtained considering equal mean received SNRs, and correspondingly, equal rate allocations for different users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To preserve the simple nature of ALOHA, no coordination among users is considered, and sophisticated schemes such as rate splitting and superposition coding are avoided. Our novel contributions are as follows: we characterize the optimal user rates to maximize the system throughput for both single-user detection and MUD cases (modeling each collision as a Gaussian multiple access channel (MAC) with fading), and show that assignment of different rates to users with different distances (i.e., with different average SNRs) provides a significant increase in the expected throughput compared to the commonly used "same rate to all users" approach (see, e.g., [22], [23], [25]), especially, if the users are spatially separated. Rather than employing superposition coding over AWGN [16] or ergodic fading scenarios [17], we adopt a constant rate approach for a given user throughout its transmission over (non-ergodic) block fading channels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%