2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2020.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum-type tests for high-dimensional regression coefficients using Wilcoxon scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the results reported in Table 3 were analyzed by a Friedman test (López-Vázquez et al 2019) at the significance level of 0.05   , and p-value = 0.000 < 0.05 was obtained; this indicates that the four algorithms had significant differences. Therefore, a Wilcoxon test (Xu et al 2020) was conducted at the significance level of 0.05   to further compare the differences between the other three algorithms and ASAPSO. The last row of Table 3 lists the results of the Wilcoxon test, and the p-values were respectively 0.023, 0.000, and 0.004, which are all less than 0.05; this means that the ASAPSO algorithm performed significantly better than the other three algorithms.…”
Section: Low-dimensional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the results reported in Table 3 were analyzed by a Friedman test (López-Vázquez et al 2019) at the significance level of 0.05   , and p-value = 0.000 < 0.05 was obtained; this indicates that the four algorithms had significant differences. Therefore, a Wilcoxon test (Xu et al 2020) was conducted at the significance level of 0.05   to further compare the differences between the other three algorithms and ASAPSO. The last row of Table 3 lists the results of the Wilcoxon test, and the p-values were respectively 0.023, 0.000, and 0.004, which are all less than 0.05; this means that the ASAPSO algorithm performed significantly better than the other three algorithms.…”
Section: Low-dimensional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%