2018
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MaxMIF: A New Method for Identifying Cancer Driver Genes through Effective Data Integration

Abstract: Identification of a few cancer driver mutation genes from a much larger number of passenger mutation genes in cancer samples remains a highly challenging task. Here, a novel method for distinguishing the driver genes from the passenger genes by effective integration of somatic mutation data and molecular interaction data using a maximal mutational impact function (MaxMIF) is presented. When evaluated on six somatic mutation datasets of Pan‐Cancer and 19 datasets of different cancer types from TCGA, MaxMIF almo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, they have some known limitations, such as a high false positive rate, and they often fail to detect driver genes with low mutation frequencies (Bashashati et al, 2012 ; Koboldt et al, 2012 ; Muzny et al, 2012 ). Based on the hypothesis that gene mutations tend to converge on a few biological pathways, some pathway-based methods attempt to identify cancer driver modules consisting of multiple genes rather than individual genes using some biological prior knowledge (Bashashati et al, 2012 ; Paull et al, 2013 ; Leiserson et al, 2015 ; Gao et al, 2017 ; Hou et al, 2018 ; Carlin et al, 2019 ). However, the application of these methods is limited by the incompleteness of prior knowledge database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they have some known limitations, such as a high false positive rate, and they often fail to detect driver genes with low mutation frequencies (Bashashati et al, 2012 ; Koboldt et al, 2012 ; Muzny et al, 2012 ). Based on the hypothesis that gene mutations tend to converge on a few biological pathways, some pathway-based methods attempt to identify cancer driver modules consisting of multiple genes rather than individual genes using some biological prior knowledge (Bashashati et al, 2012 ; Paull et al, 2013 ; Leiserson et al, 2015 ; Gao et al, 2017 ; Hou et al, 2018 ; Carlin et al, 2019 ). However, the application of these methods is limited by the incompleteness of prior knowledge database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MaxMIF ( 23 ), which outperformed the existing state-of-the-art methods (including MUFFINN ( 24 ), MuttSig2 ( 25 ), MutSigCV ( 26 ), et al) on TCGA pan-cancer datasets, was introduced to distinguish the cancer driver genes from the passenger genes. MaxMIF integrated the somatic mutation data and molecular interaction data by a maximal mutational impact function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the Asthma comparison we considered all subsets of size 6 to 402 in increments of 3. These AUCs enabled us to fit a "standard curve" for each comparison, from which we could interpolate the mean number of samples gained by using GEOlimma given initial numbers of 6,9,12, and 15 (Asthma) samples. Figure SFig-ure5 presents the AUC standard curves and Table 3 summarizes the distribution of GEOlimma effective sample sizes for each comparison.…”
Section: Geolimma Methods Application On Four Validation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%