2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00279.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mazes, Conflict, and Paradox: Tools for Understanding Chronic Pain

Abstract: This article presents an argument for framing chronic pain within a complex adaptive systems (CAS) paradigm. The first aim of this article is to demonstrate how chronic pain can be framed as a CAS and how paradox, one of the core characteristics of a CAS, exists within the chronic pain experience. The second aim is to illustrate how paradox exists at multiple levels within the health care encounter and ongoing experience of chronic pain. Finally, the article will use the example of interactions at the patient/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be that some elements of social contract theory are at play and participants' comments reflect a sense of obligation towards the pet dog who is providing emotional resources to the owner. We do not have sufficient data from this study to speculate further but will look to social contract theorists such as Palmer (1997), to guide further research in this understudied area, Chronic pain is a complex, biopsychosocial condition (Brown 2009) and privileging biological interventions alone is inadequate. We need to better understand if removing pet dogs as a solution to improved sleep could be counter-productive and lead to more, not less, sleep-related issues, including the potential for increased reliance on sleep medication and the increased need for other costlier, demanding, and less accessible, interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy and pain-related surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It may be that some elements of social contract theory are at play and participants' comments reflect a sense of obligation towards the pet dog who is providing emotional resources to the owner. We do not have sufficient data from this study to speculate further but will look to social contract theorists such as Palmer (1997), to guide further research in this understudied area, Chronic pain is a complex, biopsychosocial condition (Brown 2009) and privileging biological interventions alone is inadequate. We need to better understand if removing pet dogs as a solution to improved sleep could be counter-productive and lead to more, not less, sleep-related issues, including the potential for increased reliance on sleep medication and the increased need for other costlier, demanding, and less accessible, interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy and pain-related surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fact that the interlocutor shares a similar experience prevents, in a way, the asymmetry that could be built up when revealing one's own weaknesses [41]. In addition to avoiding a possible relational instability and thus saving face [41,42], a similar experience of pain, for many of the interviewees, appears to be a necessary condition for genuine communication about this topic [43]. More than an exchange of information, the communication of one's pain thus becomes a communion, echoing the inexpressible nature of the pain experienced in the flesh and exceeding the power of words alone [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one PWP put it, ‘I’m glad no one was hurt, but am surprised this sort of thing doesn’t happen more often’ ( Glottz line 294.). This lack of linearity and the emergence of unexpected behaviour are hallmarks of complex systems (36–39). Complexity theory illustrates that problems emerging from highly dynamic human system’s interactions cannot be remedied with linear solutions and logarithmic formulae based on assumptions of predictable, cause and effect relationships and human rationality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%