2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MBPpred: Proteome-wide detection of membrane lipid-binding proteins using profile Hidden Markov Models

Abstract: A large number of modular domains that exhibit specific lipid binding properties are present in many membrane proteins involved in trafficking and signal transduction. These domains are present in either eukaryotic peripheral membrane or transmembrane proteins and are responsible for the non-covalent interactions of these proteins with membrane lipids. Here we report a profile Hidden Markov Model based method capable of detecting Membrane Binding Proteins (MBPs) from information encoded in their amino acid seq… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All non-redundant transcripts were subjected to Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTx) [37] searches (E-value < 10 −5 ) against public protein databases, including the NCBI non-redundant (nr) [38], the Swissprot protein (Swiss-Prot) [39], the Gene Ontology (GO) [40], the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) [41], KOG [42] (the database of Clusters of Protein homology), eggNOG4.5 (a database of orthologous groups of genes), [43] and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases [44]. The predicted amino acid sequences of the unigenes were then annotated using HMMER [45]. GO analysis was used to assign putative gene functions to the uncharacterized sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All non-redundant transcripts were subjected to Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTx) [37] searches (E-value < 10 −5 ) against public protein databases, including the NCBI non-redundant (nr) [38], the Swissprot protein (Swiss-Prot) [39], the Gene Ontology (GO) [40], the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) [41], KOG [42] (the database of Clusters of Protein homology), eggNOG4.5 (a database of orthologous groups of genes), [43] and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases [44]. The predicted amino acid sequences of the unigenes were then annotated using HMMER [45]. GO analysis was used to assign putative gene functions to the uncharacterized sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical enrichment of DEGs in the KEGG pathways were tested using KOBAS 2.0 (Xie et al, 2011). Unigenes were also aligned against the Pfam (Finn et al, 2014) database using HMMER (Nastou et al, 2016). The E-value cut-offs of BLAST and HMMER were <10 À5 and <10 À10 , resulting in 122 325 annotated unigenes (Table S5).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unigenes were screened against the NR and Swiss-Prot databases using BLAST software (Deng et al, 2006;Coordinators, 2016;UniProt Consortium, 2016). The predicted amino acid sequences of the unigenes were screened against the Pfam database using HMMER software to gain annotation information (Nastou et al, 2016;Finn et al, 2013). The functional annotations of the unigenes were screened against the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG), Gene Ontology (GO; http://www.geneontology.org/), and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG; http://www.genome.jp/kegg) databases.…”
Section: Quality Control Assembly and Functional Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%