1989
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320340410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCA/MR syndrome with oligodactyly and Möbius anomaly in first cousins: New syndrome or familial facial‐limb disruption sequence?

Abstract: We report on two sibs with a multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation (MCA/MR) syndrome who have a first cousin with Möbius anomaly. This may represent a new MCA/MR syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most frequent disagreement is whether facial nerve palsy without evidence of 6th cranial nerve involvement qualifies for the diagnosis of Mö bius S. It seems inappropriate not to include the 6th nerve cranial involvement, since that is what Dr. Mö bius originally described, and that conclusion was reflected in the criteria for the studies conducted by the authors. Mö bius S. is usually a sporadic event, although there are documented cases of familial occurrence and a few cases of chromosomal changes with clinical characteristics of Mö bius S. The genetic literature is too long to be listed completely, but includes Hanissian et al (1970), Baraitser (1977), Ziter et al (1977), Mitter and Chudley (1983), Wishnick et al (1983), Journel et al (1989), McDermot et al (1991), Slee et al (1991), Donahue et al (1993), Goddard et al (1996), Kremer et al (1996), Nishikawa et al (1997), Gorlin et al (2001), Verzijl et al (2003), Kersey and Vivian (2006).…”
Section: Mö Bius S: Historicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent disagreement is whether facial nerve palsy without evidence of 6th cranial nerve involvement qualifies for the diagnosis of Mö bius S. It seems inappropriate not to include the 6th nerve cranial involvement, since that is what Dr. Mö bius originally described, and that conclusion was reflected in the criteria for the studies conducted by the authors. Mö bius S. is usually a sporadic event, although there are documented cases of familial occurrence and a few cases of chromosomal changes with clinical characteristics of Mö bius S. The genetic literature is too long to be listed completely, but includes Hanissian et al (1970), Baraitser (1977), Ziter et al (1977), Mitter and Chudley (1983), Wishnick et al (1983), Journel et al (1989), McDermot et al (1991), Slee et al (1991), Donahue et al (1993), Goddard et al (1996), Kremer et al (1996), Nishikawa et al (1997), Gorlin et al (2001), Verzijl et al (2003), Kersey and Vivian (2006).…”
Section: Mö Bius S: Historicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Möbius syndrome is often caused by environmental effects during pregnancy (Lipson et al 1989), transmission within large pedigrees has also been observed (Fortanier and Speijer 1935;van der Wiel 1957;Wilbrand and Saenger 1921). Limb defects have been reported in some Möbius patients, the relatives of Möbius patients and in another group of patients with both Möbius syndrome and Poland syndrome (Journel et al 1989;Larrandaburu et al 1999;MacDermot et al 1990;Parker et al 1981;Steigner et al 1975;Temtamy and McKusick 1978;Wishnick et al 1981). Linkage to chromosome 3q21-22 has been shown in one Möbius syndrome family consisting of five generations (Kremer et al 1996).…”
Section: Chromosomal Localisation and Association With Human Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autosomal dominant segregation has been observed [Carmena and Gómez Marcano, 1943], and a few families with apparent autosomal recessive transmission have been reported [Legum et al, 1981]. Journel et al [1989] suggested X-linked recessive inheritance. Ziter et al [1977] observed congenital facial diplegia in 7 members of three generations of a family with reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 1 and 3 with the break points occurring at 1p34 and 13q13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%