MCDA to evaluate alternative paths for urban electric micromobility

Acampa, Giovanna; Grasso, Mariolina; Ticali, Dario

doi:10.1063/5.0047778

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The term activity was also found in the literature review as equivalent to evaluation (Campinhos, 2019;Hasibuan et al, 2021;Acampa et al, 2021). An activity is understood, in this context, as a deed, an action, a work, an operation.…”

Section: What Is Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…The formation of the second group took place around the term activity. The terms involved and semantically synthesized were "activity" (Campinhos, 2019;Hasibuan et al, 2021;Acampa et al, 2021) and "act" (Santos, 2019). The semantic analysis showed that activity and act are the actions, ability, or tendency to accomplish something.…”

Section: What Is Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the primary grouping of evaluation attributes is what brings the idea of decision. This group includes the terms diagnosis (Ferreira Neto, 2021), relevance (Diniz, 2020;Almeida, 2018;Oliveira et al, 2018;Costa, 2020), decision making (Diniz, 2020;Eulálio, 2019;Almeida, 2018;Oliveira et al, 2018;Trindade, 2018;Rodrigues, 2019;Francisco, 2018;Selly, 2021; Research, Society and Development, v. 11, n. 12, e362111234288, 2022 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34288 Acampa et al, 2021), background ; decision (Francisco, 2018;Biodun, 2021)), plan (Hasibuan et al, 2021), conclusion (Hasibuan et al, 2021), filing (Eulálio, 2019), judgment (Campinhos, 2019;Trindade, 2018;Honcharenko & Honcharenko, 2021;Masa et al, 2021), guidance (Ferreira Neto, 2021), choice (Acampa et al, 2021), rational , establishment (Santos, 2019), criterion (Almeida, 2018 ), evidence (Honcharenko & Honcharenko, 2021). Among these terms, the most frequent is decision-making.…”

Section: What Is Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The act of evaluating deals with the idea of action. These actions concern activity (Diniz, 2020;Almeida, 2018;Oliveira al., 2018), construction (Campinhos, 2019), action (Campinhos, 2019;Muthmainnah et al, 2021), operation , formulation (Honcharenko & Honcharenko, 2021), intervention (Campinhos, 2019;Honcharenko & Honcharenko, 2021;Nweke, 2021;Damiola, 2020), service , capacity (Ambroise, 2020), organization (Acampa et al, 2021), program Honcharenko & Honcharenko, 2021;Damiola, 2020;Selly, 2021), policy (Honcharenko & Honcharenko, 2021) and compliance (Selly, 2021). It means that to assess is to act in search of the result that one intends to achieve, which, in this case, is to find its value.…”

Section: What Is Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The attributes verification (Ferreira Neto, 2021;Oliveira, 2019), investigation (Oliveira, 2019), measurement (Santos & Rocha, 2018), measurement tool (Yörük, 2021), interpretation (Yörük, 2021), orientation (Wildner, 2021), information (Campinhos, 2019;Rodrigues, 2019;Francisco, 2018;Acampa et al, 2021). The evaluation in this context gives the idea of determination concerns the search for information that is aimed in this process, investigate and verify, measure and interpret oriented to Research, Society andDevelopment, v. 11, n. 12, e362111234288, 2022 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34288 determine something.…”

Section: What Is Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The operational steps of the evaluation processes: a balance of the literature

Almeida

Pimentel²,

Soares³

et al. 2022

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation is a subcomponent of the control process, which, in turn, is the fourth step of the management process. Its essentiality lies in that it is through it that decisions are made about the effectiveness and efficiency of management processes. As science constantly advances in this field, it is necessary to periodically survey each management process step's state of the art of each subcomponent. In this sense, this study aimed to take stock of what evaluation is and what are its operationalization steps. The method used was the scientific-technological one, characterized by elaborating guiding research questions, data collection on scientific bases, data organization, and generating the sought answers. The results showed that a) evaluation is the decision process that allows comparing what was planned with what was executed, b) the evaluation process is composed of five basic steps: planning, execution, monitoring, analysis of results, and reporting analytical, and c) each step has its criteria to be executed. The conclusion shows that changing the order of these steps can decisively compromise the intended objectives of the entire evaluation process, which is knowledge about the difference between what was planned and what was executed.

show abstract

Section: What Is Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: What Is Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%