2021
DOI: 10.4018/ijdsst.2021010104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCDM Model for Natural Gas Pressure Reducing Station Site Selection

Abstract: Considering the increasing scenario of natural gas consumption, it is necessary that all agents in the chain use methods that structure decision-making and problem-solving processes. This paper proposes a multicriteria decision model to solve a site selection problem for a pressure reducing station. A natural gas distribution company was selected to test the model and the preference modeling was conducted through the flexible interactive tradeoff (FITradeoff) approach, according to the preferences of the decis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De Lacerda et al (2021) used the method to solve a site selection problem for a station of natural gas. DMs from a company which distribute natural gas participated in this study.…”
Section: Location Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Lacerda et al (2021) used the method to solve a site selection problem for a station of natural gas. DMs from a company which distribute natural gas participated in this study.…”
Section: Location Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldin de Lacerda et al. (2021) designed a model conducted through the flexible interactive tradeoff (FITradeoff) approach, according to the preferences of the decision maker. A natural gas distribution company was selected to test this model.…”
Section: Basic Data For This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection benchmarks of leading industry from different perspectives are various. Researches on the selection methods of regional leading industry also emerge in, mainly about two categories (qualitative and quantitative), including comprehensive evaluation methods such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Information Entropy (IE), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Shift-Share-Analysis Method (SSM), Grey System (GS) and Fuzzy Reasoning (FR) (Chao et al, 2016;Lacerda et al, 2021;Y.-q. Liu et al, 2006;Webster, 2013;Zhou, Wang, & Goh, 2018;Zhou, Wang, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%