2022
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2020.3047046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mCRF and mRD: Two Classification Methods Based on a Novel Multiclass Label Noise Filtering Learning Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future indications for this work are an expansion of our dataset and inclusion of classification images of NPDR, such as mild, moderate, and severe classes, for more complex classification problems. In addition, some robust classifiers can be discussed to improve accuracy in future research, which can refer to [47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future indications for this work are an expansion of our dataset and inclusion of classification images of NPDR, such as mild, moderate, and severe classes, for more complex classification problems. In addition, some robust classifiers can be discussed to improve accuracy in future research, which can refer to [47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guan et al [30] proposed a sequential ensemble noise filter that generated a noise score for each feature instance to identify noisy labels. Xia et al [31] defined relative density based on the idea that samples surrounded by heterogeneous points were more likely to be the noise than homogeneous points to identify noise [10] . Samples with a relative density greater than or equal to the preset threshold were considered mislabeled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of sensor data, artifacts of the sensor device or noise caused by the environment can degrade signal quality [ 10 , 11 ]. Moreover, manual labeling of collected data may be erroneous owing to mistakes or insufficient information [ 12 , 13 ]. Data collected via crawling may be unintentionally collected or incorrectly labeled [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%