2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icse.2013.6606712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCT: A tool for commenting programs by multimedia comments

Abstract: Abstract-Program comments have always been the key to understanding code. However, typical text comments can easily become verbose or evasive. Thus sometimes code reviewers find an audio or video code narration quite helpful. In this paper, we present our tool, called MCT (Multimedia Commenting Tool), which is an integrated development environment-based tool that enables programmers to easily explain their code by voice, video and mouse movement in the form of comments. With this tool, programmers can replay t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ViDI gives a basic support to leave notes on code entities, which are treated as full-fledged critics. This idea can be expanded in many directions, for example to support more complex comments [22], [23] that are common on other code review tools, or to provide dedicated mechanisms to handle exceptions and personalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ViDI gives a basic support to leave notes on code entities, which are treated as full-fledged critics. This idea can be expanded in many directions, for example to support more complex comments [22], [23] that are common on other code review tools, or to provide dedicated mechanisms to handle exceptions and personalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single approach [113] is dedicated to support patch documentation. It consists of a tool-named Multimedia Commenting Tool (MCT)-implemented as an Eclipse plug-in.…”
Section: Patch Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics investigated are impact on software 2 We did not include the 21 papers selected in the pilot study and 46 tentatively accepted papers in this paper due to the space constraints. We will include them in our extended paper Improve the skills of newcomer developers [50] Measure the performance of modern code review and a method to study linux-style reviews [34] Address challenges in modern code review process when conducted by third-part organization [32] Allow developers to explain their code using voice and video [26] Remove stagnation from modern code review [87] Analyse how code changes affect test code [52] Assist mining modern code review data by enabling better understand of dataset context and identifying abnormalities [75] Automatically identify factors that confuse reviewers [18] Automatically partition composite changes and then facilitate modern code reviews [72] Cleaner modern code review [41] Modern code review driven by software quality concerns [81] Collect modern code review data, generate metrics and provide ways to access the metrics and data [10] Community-based modern code review [98] Determine how code changes should be ordered to facilitate modern code reviews (increase cognitive support) [6] Estimate modern code review effort based on patch size and complexity [45] Explore the need for a new generation tool of modern code review tools [4] Focus on design quality concerns [82] Choose pre-or post-commit modern code reviews [5] Identify problems with modern code review processes [24] Identify security problems with web-based systems [14] Improve modern code review process within organization [15] Peer modern code review [31] Retrieve modern code review data [23] Summarize similar changes and detect missing or inconsistent edits [97] Support the modern code review of visual programming languages [60] Track modern code review performance [33] Use of mobile to review source code [21] Use of social networks for frequent modern code reviews …”
Section: Impact And/or Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%