2014
DOI: 10.3133/sir20145006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean annual, seasonal, and monthly precipitation and runoff in Arkansas, 1951-2011

Abstract: For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(winter). In the southern part of the Ozark system study area, the greatest precipitation occurred during the months of March through May and November and December (Pugh and Westerman, 2014). Seasonal precipitation for the Ozark system varied around the mean by approximately 170-208 percent.…”
Section: Aquifer Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(winter). In the southern part of the Ozark system study area, the greatest precipitation occurred during the months of March through May and November and December (Pugh and Westerman, 2014). Seasonal precipitation for the Ozark system varied around the mean by approximately 170-208 percent.…”
Section: Aquifer Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized the results of this two-period analysis to produce flow duration curves for the pre-alteration period (start of record-1986) and the post alteration period , as well as to examine the change in 7-day minimum flow before and after 1987. We chose the year of 1987 as a breakpoint due to the analysis of census data indicating a rise in irrigated cropland area at this time ( Figure 3A), as well as evidence that surface and groundwater connectivity began to change at this time in the MRVAA region (Clark et al, 2011;Pugh and Westerman, 2014).…”
Section: Indicators Of Hydrologic Alteration (Iha)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface interpolations of the alluvial aquifer show a cone of depression occurring in the Cache River basin, with the deepest portion 29 to 44 m below surface. Comparatively, in the areas outside of the cones of depression, depth to water is 0 to 13 m. Without knowledge of riverbed material and infiltration capability, it is not possible to know the extent that depth to groundwater affects surface water resources in the declining areas, although modeling studies and data collected in the region do suggest rivers are losing water to recharge the alluvial aquifer (Schrader, 2010;Pugh and Westerman, 2014).…”
Section: Evidence Of Groundwater Declinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the Springfield-Salem Plateaus near the Missouri State line and the Arkansas Valley near the Oklahoma State line to 64 in. in the Ouachita Mountains (Pugh and Westerman, 2014). Wagner and others (2016) used data collected through 2013 and the Expected Moments Algorithm (EMA) for fitting the Log-Pearson Type III distribution of the annual peak streamflow data that were used to estimate AEPFs others, 1997, 2001;Griffis and others, 2004).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%