2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-008-0148-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean curvature flow with surgeries of two–convex hypersurfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
285
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
285
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our construction should also be compared with that of G Huisken and C Sinestrari [14] for Mean Curvature Flow, where in particular there is a similar argument for nonaccumulation of surgeries. Needless to say, we rely heavily on Perelman's work, in particular the notions of Ä -noncollapsing and canonical neighbourhoods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our construction should also be compared with that of G Huisken and C Sinestrari [14] for Mean Curvature Flow, where in particular there is a similar argument for nonaccumulation of surgeries. Needless to say, we rely heavily on Perelman's work, in particular the notions of Ä -noncollapsing and canonical neighbourhoods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In [Hui84], Huisken showed that MCF starting at any smooth compact convex initial hypersurface in R n+1 remains smooth and convex until it becomes extinct at a point and if we rescale the flow about the point in space-time where it becomes extinct, then the rescalings converge to round spheres. Huisken-Sinestrari, [HS99a], [HS99b], and White, [Whi00], [Whi03], have proven a number of striking and important results about MCF of mean convex hypersurfaces and their singularities and Huisken-Sinestrari, [HS09], have developed a theory for MCF with surgery for two-convex hypersurfaces in R n+1 (n ≥ 3) using their analysis of singularities (and their blow ups).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, our examples evidence that a singularity analysis following the traditional approaches ( [14], [23] and references therein) is not possible for the constrained versions of mcf. The only remaining hope is to produce completely different techniques to face the study of singularities or to find another curvature condition (stronger than mean convexity but weaker than convexity) which is preserved under (1.1).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%