2000
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.62.6065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean first passage time for anomalous diffusion

Abstract: When the random force acting on a particle diffusing in an interval [0,L] and subjected to a constant external force is a Gaussian white noise, the "Brownian" mean-squared displacement is described by the seminal relation =2Dt(gamma) with gamma=1. However, for more complicated random forces the diffusion may be slower (gamma<1, "subdiffusion") or faster (gamma>1, "superdiffusion") than the "normal" diffusion. For both these cases we calculated the mean free passage time (MFPT)-the time needed to reach on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
95
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doing so leads to erroneous analytical results, in contrast e.g. with Monte Carlo simulations [41,42,43,44]. This also implies that standard techniques such as the method of images are not applicable [12,32].…”
Section: Boundary Conditions For the Eigenvalue Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doing so leads to erroneous analytical results, in contrast e.g. with Monte Carlo simulations [41,42,43,44]. This also implies that standard techniques such as the method of images are not applicable [12,32].…”
Section: Boundary Conditions For the Eigenvalue Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the first passage time for subdiffusion was recently a matter of considerable interest and dispute in the literature [16,17,18]. It is now understood [19,20,21] that the mean first passage time diverges for subdiffusion, because a subdiffusing walker tends to remain too long on the place that it once reached.…”
Section: /2 With Time T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can mention some erroneous results for Lévy flights obtained in Ref. [Gitterman, 2000], because author used the traditional conditions at two absorbing boundaries (see the related correspondence [Yuste & Lindenberg, 2004;Gitterman, 2004]). The numerical results for the first passage time of free Lévy flights confined in a finite interval were presented in Ref.…”
Section: Barrier Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%