2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-013-9826-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean Flow Near Edges and Within Cavities Situated Inside Dense Canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the patch cases, tower 1 and 2 show the attenuated profile inside the canopy and they reach their free surface layer log profile in the canopy space. For the mean 10 vertical velocity profile W , the profiles inside and outside the canopy show significant difference possibly due to edge effects (Banerjee et al, 2013). One interesting observation is increased W magnitude close to the canopy top for the HH case, patch 1 and the tower 5 for patch 2, which is close to the next canopy, which are relevant for signatures of KH motion.…”
Section: Synchronization Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the patch cases, tower 1 and 2 show the attenuated profile inside the canopy and they reach their free surface layer log profile in the canopy space. For the mean 10 vertical velocity profile W , the profiles inside and outside the canopy show significant difference possibly due to edge effects (Banerjee et al, 2013). One interesting observation is increased W magnitude close to the canopy top for the HH case, patch 1 and the tower 5 for patch 2, which is close to the next canopy, which are relevant for signatures of KH motion.…”
Section: Synchronization Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The representation of the canopy in the LES follows the standard distributed drag parameterization (Shaw and Schumann, 1992;Watanabe, 2004;Patton et al, 2016) by adding an additional term in the mo-5 mentum budget equations as F di = C d a |u|u i where a is a one sided frontal plant area density (PAD), C d is a dimensionless drag coefficient assumed to be 0.3 (Katul et al, 2004;Banerjee et al, 2013), |u| is the resolved wind speed and u i is the resolved velocity component (i = 1, 2, 3, i.e. u, v and w), i.e.…”
Section: Large Eddy Simulations (Les)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Strong difference of surface properties and large swaths of such surface patches are known to induce secondary circulations (Mah-10 fouf et al, 1987;Dalu and Pielke, 1993;Raupach and Finnigan, 1995;Courault et al, 2007;van Heerwaarden and Guerau de Arellano, 2008;Garcia-Carreras et al, 2010;Banerjee et al, 2013;Dixon et al, 2013;Sühring and Raasch, 2013;Kang and Lenschow, 2014;Van Heerwaarden et al, 2014). Recent works by Mauder et al (2007), Stoy et al (2013) and Eder et al (2014) have suggested that non-closure of energy balance is also related to advection and flux divergence due to secondary circulations (Kanda et al, 2004;Foken, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%