1980
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.22.6065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean free path and density of conductance electrons in platinum determined by the size effect in extremely thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
61
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the fit, it is found that ͓͑T͒͑T͔͒ Pt =8ϫ 10 −11 ⍀ cm 2 , in good agreement with the value reported by Fischer et al for 2 nm thick Pt films ͑2 ϫ 10 −11 ⍀ cm 2 ͒. 35 In our NW, an enhanced value for the quantity ͓͑T͒͑T͔͒ Pt is reasonable because the number of carriers is greater than in ultrathin films, due to the fact that a lower-defect density is expected. The fit result for the specular scattering coefficient is p FS = 0.177, very close to the values reported by , and the grain-boundary reflection coefficient R gr = 0.227, is comparable with the values obtained for thin Au films (0.295), for Cu (0.24), and for Al (0.17).…”
Section: ͑3͒supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the fit, it is found that ͓͑T͒͑T͔͒ Pt =8ϫ 10 −11 ⍀ cm 2 , in good agreement with the value reported by Fischer et al for 2 nm thick Pt films ͑2 ϫ 10 −11 ⍀ cm 2 ͒. 35 In our NW, an enhanced value for the quantity ͓͑T͒͑T͔͒ Pt is reasonable because the number of carriers is greater than in ultrathin films, due to the fact that a lower-defect density is expected. The fit result for the specular scattering coefficient is p FS = 0.177, very close to the values reported by , and the grain-boundary reflection coefficient R gr = 0.227, is comparable with the values obtained for thin Au films (0.295), for Cu (0.24), and for Al (0.17).…”
Section: ͑3͒supporting
confidence: 79%
“…The fit result for the specular scattering coefficient is p FS = 0.177, very close to the values reported by , and the grain-boundary reflection coefficient R gr = 0.227, is comparable with the values obtained for thin Au films (0.295), for Cu (0.24), and for Al (0.17). 32,34,35 The mean average grain diameter extracted from the fit is 21 nm, consistent with measured grain sizes ͑20-30 nm͒ in HRSEM images. This combined model allows the relative magnitude of the grainboundary and the surface-scattering contributions to be estimated: grain-boundary scattering dominates over surface scattering at all temperatures by a factor of two.…”
Section: ͑3͒supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Note that, in the approximation B0, Eq. (1) leads to the standard SMR relation [11,28] Einstein relation is not trivial since it is a two-band metal with a complex Fermi surface and, furthermore, the density of states can differ from the bulk value [56,57], which is the reason for the lack of reference values. Therefore, our model gives a powerful alternative to the current methods used to extract an effective diffusion coefficient in ultrathin metal films.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally 0.0034/°C. This measured value is lower than the theoretical value of bulk pure Pt (0.0039/°C) because the electron scattering would be cause grain not be density during the film sputtering [16]. Of course, the deviation will also be caused by fabrication parameters, testing method, etc.…”
Section: Thin Film Processes -Artifacts On Surface Phenomena and Techmentioning
confidence: 65%