2004
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.1.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean Generation Analysis of the Damage caused by <I>Sesamia nonagrioides</I> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and <I>Ostrinia nubilalis</I> (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Sweet Corn Ears

Abstract: Sesamia nonagrioides (Lefebvre) and Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) are the main maize (Zea mays L.) pests in Mediterranean countries. To develop insect-resistant cultivars, it is helpful to know the genetic control of the resistance. Our objective was to determine the genetic control of the resistance to both borers. For each of two crosses (EP59 x P51 and 15125 x EP61), six generations were evaluated (P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1, and BC2). Genetic effects x environment interactions were not significant. For the O. nubil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in concordance with previous experiments in which the dominant effects were not significant, except for one single cross [14-16]. Contrarily to stalk tunnel length, the hybrid was more ear resistant than the most resistant line indicating that dominant effects would also play an important role, in agreement with results reported by Cartea et al [18] and Velasco et al [31]. Similarly, the EP39 × EP42 hybrid exhibited a considerable degree of heterosis for most agronomic traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in concordance with previous experiments in which the dominant effects were not significant, except for one single cross [14-16]. Contrarily to stalk tunnel length, the hybrid was more ear resistant than the most resistant line indicating that dominant effects would also play an important role, in agreement with results reported by Cartea et al [18] and Velasco et al [31]. Similarly, the EP39 × EP42 hybrid exhibited a considerable degree of heterosis for most agronomic traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies on maize found that there was no relationship between ear and stem resistance to the MCB [53,54]; therefore, the kernel damage response to MCB was not predictable at the start of these experiments. The healthiest ears were found in EPS20_Short_LIBRC3 (8.68) and EPS21_Short_LIBRC1 (8.70), while the more damaged ears were found in EPS20_Large_LIBRC3 (7.88) and EPS21_Large_LIBRC1 (8.28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Most studies have evaluated insect resistance in a wide sense, using the pith tunnel length produced by MCB under artificial infestation as the classifying criteria (Malvar et al, 1993;Butroń et al, 1999;Velasco et al, 1999a;Velasco et al, 1999b;Malvar et al, 2004;Velasco et al, 2004a;Butroń et al, 2005;Butroń et al, 2006;Malvar et al, 2007;Revilla et al, 2007). Once sources of resistance were identified (Butroń et al, 1999;Malvar et al, 2004), research was oriented to study trait inheritance (Cartea et al, 1999;Velasco et al, 2002;Velasco et al, 2004b;Butroń et al, 2009) and to develop the most suitable phenotypic selection programs to increase maize resistance and/or tolerance to MCB (Sandoya et al, 2008;Butroń et al, 2012;Ordaś et al, 2012;Samayoa et al, 2012;Butroń et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%