2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean zonal flows induced by weak mechanical forcings in rotating spheroids

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(350 reference statements)
0
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ekman number scalings we have observed are very different from the zonal flows generated by tidal forcing in a full sphere in the experiments (with a deformable no-slip boundary) of, for example, Morize et al (2010), where the zonal velocity scales as 2 E −3/10 , or for those produced by inertial waves, as studied in Cébron al. (2021) and Lin & Noir (2021), where it instead scales 2 E 0 or 2 E −1/10 , respectively (though these also result from self-interaction, so the zonal velocity also scales as 2 ).…”
Section: Scaling Laws For Tidally-generated Differential Rotation: Ef...contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The Ekman number scalings we have observed are very different from the zonal flows generated by tidal forcing in a full sphere in the experiments (with a deformable no-slip boundary) of, for example, Morize et al (2010), where the zonal velocity scales as 2 E −3/10 , or for those produced by inertial waves, as studied in Cébron al. (2021) and Lin & Noir (2021), where it instead scales 2 E 0 or 2 E −1/10 , respectively (though these also result from self-interaction, so the zonal velocity also scales as 2 ).…”
Section: Scaling Laws For Tidally-generated Differential Rotation: Ef...contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The Ekman number scalings we have observed are very different from the zonal flows generated by tidal forcing in a full sphere in the experiments (with a deformable no-slip boundary) of, for example, Morize et al (2010), where the zonal velocity scales as 𝜖 2 E −3/10 , or for those produced by libration-driven inertial waves, as studied in Cébron et al (2021) and Lin & Noir (2021), where it instead scales as 𝜖 2 E 0 or 𝜖 2 E −1/10 , respectively (though these also result from self-interaction, so the zonal velocity also scales as 𝜖 2 ). We underline that the best fitting laws here seem quite different from the ones emerging in Paper I in E −3/2 and E −1/2 , presumably because of the non-wavelike nonlinearities involved in their work.…”
Section: Scaling Laws For Tidally-generated Differential Rotation: Ef...contrasting
confidence: 74%
“…is worth noting that the mean geostrophic flow ω(2) z has an amplitude that is independent of E in the vanishing regime E → 0, which is somehow similar to the mean geostrophic flows driven by nonlinear boundary-layer interactions for NS-BC (e.g. Cébron et al 2021).…”
Section: Laminar Forced Flowsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Busse 1968; Cébron et al. 2021) or in the bulk through the action of the Reynolds stresses (e.g. Zhang & Liao 2004; Livermore et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation