Rivulets [1] and their meandering on a partially wetting surface [2] present an interesting problem, as complex behavior arises from a deceptively simple setup. Recently Couvreur and Daerr [3] suggested that meandering is caused by an instability developing as the flow rate Q increases to a critical value Q c , with stationary (pinned) meandering being the final state of the flow. We tried to verify this assertion experimentally, but instead produced results contradicting the claim of Ref. [3]. The likely reason behind the discrepancy is the persistence of flow-rate perturbations. Moreover, the theory presented in this paper cannot reproduce the states as considered and disagrees with other theories [4][5][6].First, we tried reproducing the critical flow rate precipitating meandering as reported [3]. We were unable to do so with two carefully constructed experimental arrangements (one at the University of New Mexico, another at the University of North Carolina), both using the same substrate (glass), same fluid (water), and same flow parameters as the experiments of Ref. [3], with the fluid supply following the design described in our previous work [5]. The stationary pattern that emerged was a non-meandering, straight flow over the span exceeding 2 m. This applies to flow rates 0.2-8 ml/s, while the range of flow rate of Ref.[3] was 0.2-1.8 ml/s. The likely cause of this difference is the "constant level tank" Couvreur and Daerr employ: a constant (on average) level of fluid in the tank by itself does not guarantee that the instantaneous flow rate is constant (only the average), and the flow meandering is keenly sensitive to even modest flow rate Q perturbations, as discussed in [5,7,8].In a tank with a source of velocity fluctuations near the bottom (e.g., a pump), these fluctuations rapidly de-cay away from the source (consider exponential decay in Stokes' second problem). Thus the top (far) boundary well may appear unperturbed, while the discharge rate from the bottom of the tank is affected.Any Q variation (e.g., Q increase) can temporarily destabilize a rivulet and mislead an observer into believing it has precipitated meandering. We have recorded [9] transient meandering in response to Q increase or decrease between constant levels (how slow a rate change should be not to trigger meandering would be an interesting subject for further study). A stationary flow can be driven to meander with a short sequence of rate fluctuations ( Fig.