1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61735-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meaningless terms in rewriting

Abstract: We present an axiomatic approach to meaninglessness in finite and transfinite term rewriting and lambda calculus. We justify our axioms in two ways. First, they are shown to imply important properties of meaninglessness: genericity of the class of meaningless terms, the consistency of equating all meaningless terms, and the construction of Böhm trees. Second we show that they can be easily verified for existing notions of meaninglessness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three infinitary lambda calculi mentioned in the first three rows of Figure 1 capture the well-known cases of Böhm, Lévy-Longo and Berarducci trees [4,9,10]. In the fourth row, there is an uncountable class of infinitary lambda calculi with a ⊥-rule parametrised by a set U of meaningless terms [11,12]. By changing the parameter set U of the ⊥-rule, we obtain different infinitary lambda calculi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The three infinitary lambda calculi mentioned in the first three rows of Figure 1 capture the well-known cases of Böhm, Lévy-Longo and Berarducci trees [4,9,10]. In the fourth row, there is an uncountable class of infinitary lambda calculi with a ⊥-rule parametrised by a set U of meaningless terms [11,12]. By changing the parameter set U of the ⊥-rule, we obtain different infinitary lambda calculi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This set contains the three sets of Böhm, Lévy-Longo and Berarducci trees. In [10][11][12], an alternative definition of the set Λ ∞ ⊥ is given using a metric. The coinductive and metric definitions are equivalent [3].…”
Section: Infinite Lambda Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations