2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00739.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meanings on Multiple Levels: The Influence of Field‐Level and Organizational‐Level Meaning Systems on Diffusion

Abstract: This study considers how organization-level and field-level meaning systems affect when firms adopt administrative innovations. We use a sample of over 1200 manufacturing sites to test hypotheses regarding the timing of adoption of Manufacturing Best Practice programmes. The results indicate that compatibility of the diffusing practice with the organization's internal meaning system is an important predictor of when firms adopt such programmes. However, the influence of such compatibility declines for later ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study provides an example and points to the need for multi-level research on institutionalization, such as recent work considering the organizational and field level perspective (Love and Cebon, 2008;Purdy and Gray, 2009). By focusing on the micro-level behaviour of actors, we have been able to draw attention to the role of managers and professionals at the front-line in connection with the organizational level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Our study provides an example and points to the need for multi-level research on institutionalization, such as recent work considering the organizational and field level perspective (Love and Cebon, 2008;Purdy and Gray, 2009). By focusing on the micro-level behaviour of actors, we have been able to draw attention to the role of managers and professionals at the front-line in connection with the organizational level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…There is a long line of research on this model, several of them confirming the existence of differences in motivations for early vs. later adopters. However, more recently, scholars have called for rethinking this model (Lounsbury , Love & Cebon ). In particular, social and economic motivations may not be mutually exclusive and may in fact, coexist (Kraatz & Zajac , Kennedy & Fiss ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument suggests hypotheses that distinguish population-and organization-level mechanisms of practice variation (Ansari et al 2010, Love and Cebon 2008, Schneiberg and Soule 2005. We now turn to translating the argument into hypotheses regarding variation in golden parachutes.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%