2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.12002.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Means-Tested Public Pensions, Portfolio Choice and Decumulation in Retirement*

Abstract: Age Pension means-testing buffers retired households against shocks to wealth and may influence decumulation patterns and portfolio allocations. Simulations from a simple model of optimal consumption and allocation strategies for a means-tested retired household indicate that, relative to benchmark, eligible and neareligible households should optimally decumulate faster, and choose more risky portfolios, especially early in retirement. Empirical modelling of a Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model in Ding (2014) does not constrain drawdown with minimum withdrawal, which would limit the author from finding a semi-closed form solution. Similarly, other authors that focus on means-tested pension also do not enforce minimum withdrawal rates, such as Hulley et al (2013), who use Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) utility to understand consumption and investment behaviour, or Iskhakov et al (2015), who investigate how annuity purchases change in relation to Age Pension. It should be noted that their assumptions do not include Allocated Pension accounts; thus, minimum withdrawal rates may not apply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model in Ding (2014) does not constrain drawdown with minimum withdrawal, which would limit the author from finding a semi-closed form solution. Similarly, other authors that focus on means-tested pension also do not enforce minimum withdrawal rates, such as Hulley et al (2013), who use Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) utility to understand consumption and investment behaviour, or Iskhakov et al (2015), who investigate how annuity purchases change in relation to Age Pension. It should be noted that their assumptions do not include Allocated Pension accounts; thus, minimum withdrawal rates may not apply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend is similar to that reported in the study by Ding et al [17], in which retirees are assumed to replicate a European put option for their wealth requirement. 4 Retirees are also found to use increasing risk exposure to hedge against risk in other studies, such as Hulley et al [47] and Thorp et al [48].…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Further, the desire investigate more interesting and realistic problems has led to an expansion beyond those problems that can be solved analytically. Examples include the introduction of different investment products in the decision making process (Hanewald et al 2013;Horneff et al 2015), and the desire to use more complicated assumptions (Hulley et al 2013;Michaelides and Zhang 2015). Shapiro (2010) gives a detailed literature review on decision making in preparing for and during retirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%