2009
DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.050427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles deaths in Nepal: estimating the national case-fatality ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our active case investigation yielded high numbers of deaths compared to those that had been reported in the national surveillance system. In line with our study, Anand et al (2009) in a study measles deaths in Nepal also found that measles deaths and cases were being under reported by the routine surveillance system [ 20 ]. This could be probably due to the fact that most deaths occurred at home, and hence were not captured by the system as there is lack of systematic procedures to report such incidences at local level or villages even in the presence of the village health teams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, our active case investigation yielded high numbers of deaths compared to those that had been reported in the national surveillance system. In line with our study, Anand et al (2009) in a study measles deaths in Nepal also found that measles deaths and cases were being under reported by the routine surveillance system [ 20 ]. This could be probably due to the fact that most deaths occurred at home, and hence were not captured by the system as there is lack of systematic procedures to report such incidences at local level or villages even in the presence of the village health teams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Most previous surveys in India did not clearly describe use of household lists and lists of cases in order to maximize the ascertainment of deaths. The CFR in Bihar was comparable to that found in Nepal, where the CFR was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.5–2.3) overall, 3.5% in cases <1 year of age, 2% in cases 1–4 years, and 0.2 in cases 5–14 years of age [2]. Methods for ascertainment of measles cases and death in the current study were similar to the study conducted in Nepal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It has been suggested that higher measles vaccination coverage lower mortality rates directly through reduced disease incidence and indirectly by increasing the median age at infection, resulting in more cases in older age groups with lower mortality rates, or by decreasing incidence, resulting in a lower intensity of transmission [11] . These studies often relied on records of vaccination status before the outbreak [21] or had higher proportions of cases vaccinated [2] , [23] . No difference in CFR between vaccinated and unvaccinated children was found in our study, with only 27% of cases with a history of vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated time at infection in this study starts after the incubation period, as the appearance the measles rash is the starting point to estimating whether a death should be classified as acute or delayed (Aaby 1995). There is a limited amount of literature on the time from infection until death, but one study found that most acute deaths occurred within 1 to 2 weeks of the onset of the measles rash (Joshi et al 2009).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%