2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles epidemic in Brazil in the post-elimination period: Coordinated response and containment strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This improved vaccination rate has led to decreased and/or elimination of some of the common and potentially fatal diseases of children. For instance, it is known that measles infection predisposes to opportunistic infection for years [ 25 ; 26 ] and measles has been eliminated from Brazil for almost a decade, although there was an outbreak in 2013, which was contained [ 27 ; 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improved vaccination rate has led to decreased and/or elimination of some of the common and potentially fatal diseases of children. For instance, it is known that measles infection predisposes to opportunistic infection for years [ 25 ; 26 ] and measles has been eliminated from Brazil for almost a decade, although there was an outbreak in 2013, which was contained [ 27 ; 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em 2014, autores (19) Lemos e colaboradores (20) afirmam que, o principal desafio para a manutenção da eliminação do sarampo é manter um sistema de vigilância altamente sensível, mesmo com a ocorrência concomitante de outras doenças. Estes dados refletem que desde a certificação de eliminação do sarampo no país em 2016, a taxa de cobertura não alcançou a meta estipulada de 95% no Estado (22) .…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…From the 17 studies included in this review, four articles were from China (Jin et al, 2011;Ma et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2015), three from Senegal (Cisse et al, 1999;Garenne & Aaby, 1990;Whittle et al, 1999), two from the Federated States of Micronesia (Hales et al, 2016;Pike et al, 2017), and one each from India (Rathi et al, 2017), Bolivia (Quiroga et al, 2003), Brazil (Lemos & Franco, 2017), Venezuela (Sarmiento et al, 2011), Republic of Marshall Islands (Marin et al, 2006), Romania (Njau et al, 2019), Tanzania (Goodson et al, 2010), and Ethiopia (Wallace et al, 2014). Eleven of the studies involved both male and female participants and the remaining six had no data on sex distribution of subjects (Garenne & Aaby, 1990;Marin et al, 2006;Pike et al, 2017;Quiroga et al, 2003;Sarmiento et al, 2011;Wallace et al, 2014).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%