2001
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822001000100016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles serodiagnosis: production and evaluation of the IgM-measles ELISA IAL reagent

Abstract: Recent measles outbreaks in different countries led to an increase of laboratory measles diagnosis. Thus, we developed the IgM-Measles ELISA IAL , using measles virus antigens obtained from cell cultured in microcarriers in order to supply reagent kits to Brazilian public health laboratories. A batch of antigenic reagent was produced and evaluated in the enzyme immunoassay in comparison with clinical diagnosis and with as reference assay (IgM Capture ELISA CDC ) data. This study was performed in a positive pan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different ways to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a technique. In the present interlaboratory evaluations we focused on some procedures with which we have become familiar considering the development and evaluation of new reagents (18), quality control analysis (19), and comparison of techniques (20) for the diagnosis of some parasitic and viral infections. In general, the diagnostic performance of the TF-Test was better than that of conventional techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different ways to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a technique. In the present interlaboratory evaluations we focused on some procedures with which we have become familiar considering the development and evaluation of new reagents (18), quality control analysis (19), and comparison of techniques (20) for the diagnosis of some parasitic and viral infections. In general, the diagnostic performance of the TF-Test was better than that of conventional techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%