2012
DOI: 10.5365/wpsar.2012.3.3.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles transmission in health care waiting rooms: implications for public health response

Abstract: As Australia moves towards measles elimination, follow-up of cases is important; however, with limited public health resources a targeted response is vital. In this small but well documented series of secondary cases acquired in a health care setting, all were infected following direct, proximate contact of at least 20 minutes. Changes to the national guidelines may be warranted, ensuring that limited resources are focused on following up contacts at greatest risk of disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Measles surveillance systems will not always identify every case of disease, 13,24 as evidenced by the retrospective identification of measles index cases in emergency department outbreaks 13,25,26 and through analysis of the hospitalisation data that identified possible case-patients that were not notified. Diagnostic or coding errors would most likely explain the additional measles hospitalisations identified among persons aged 65 years and over that were not notified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measles surveillance systems will not always identify every case of disease, 13,24 as evidenced by the retrospective identification of measles index cases in emergency department outbreaks 13,25,26 and through analysis of the hospitalisation data that identified possible case-patients that were not notified. Diagnostic or coding errors would most likely explain the additional measles hospitalisations identified among persons aged 65 years and over that were not notified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with previous national reports, 22,23 measles case notification rates and hospitalisation rates were almost double for Aboriginal people during the overall reporting period but was not found to be statistically significant. However in 2011, this differential increased, and Aboriginal persons had statistically significantly higher measles notification rates.Measles surveillance systems will not always identify every case of disease, 13,24 as evidenced by the retrospective identification of measles index cases in emergency department outbreaks 13,25,26 and through analysis of the hospitalisation data that identified possible case-patients that were not notified. Diagnostic or coding errors would most likely explain the additional measles hospitalisations identified among persons aged 65 years and over that were not notified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to a report of 17 locally acquired measles cases in NSW in 2011, where only six were diagnosed on their first contact with a health service; one case was diagnosed on sixth visit to a health facility and two were diagnosed retrospectively on review of emergency department triage notes five months later. 8 There have been only 237 measles cases over the last decade; therefore many Victorian medical practitioners would never have had first-hand experience with measles. Medical practitioners might not recognise clinical measles, including the non-specific prodromal symptoms before rash onset, and might be unaware of the requirement for immediate notification by telephone on suspicion of measles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 It has been long known and recently reiterated that nonvaccinating patients pose a risk to others in the waiting room, especially infants who are not yet old enough to be vaccinated or individuals whose immune systems are compromised. 66,67 Physicians' dismissal of vaccine-refusing families runs counter to recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Bioethics. 68,69 The AAP stresses that health care providers should address vaccine refusal through hearing the family's concerns and discussing the risks that accompany not vaccinating one's child.…”
Section: Parents Who Refuse Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%