2013
DOI: 10.4171/ggd/179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurable chromatic and independence numbers for ergodic graphs and group actions

Abstract: We study in this paper combinatorial problems concerning graphs generated by measure preserving actions of countable groups on standard measure spaces. In particular we study chromatic and independence numbers, in both the measure-theoretic and the Borel context, and relate the behavior of these parameters to properties of the acting group such as amenability, Kazhdan's property (T), and freeness. We also prove a Borel analog of the classical Brooks' Theorem in finite combinatorics for actions of groups with f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) When is amenable, this follows from the result of Abért et al [ACLT] that Cay( , S) admits a perfect matching, using also the quasi-tiling machinery of Ornstein and Weiss [OW], as in Conley and Kechris [CK,4.10,4.11]. The second case follows immediately from Rokhlin's lemma.…”
Section: Fix An Infinite Groupmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(i) When is amenable, this follows from the result of Abért et al [ACLT] that Cay( , S) admits a perfect matching, using also the quasi-tiling machinery of Ornstein and Weiss [OW], as in Conley and Kechris [CK,4.10,4.11]. The second case follows immediately from Rokhlin's lemma.…”
Section: Fix An Infinite Groupmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Indeed, this fails for = Z or = (Z/2Z) * (Z/2Z) (with the usual set of generators S for which d = 2) and a the shift action of on 2 , since then the shift action of on Col(2, , S) with this random coloring would be mixing and then as in (i) ⇒ (ii) of Proposition 7.2, by taking b to be also mixing, one could have a mixing action a ∈ FR( , X, µ) for which there is a measurable 2-coloring, which easily gives a contradiction. On the other hand, it follows from the result in [CK,5.12] that was mentioned earlier, that for any with finitely many ends, except for = Z or = (Z/2Z) * (Z/2Z), one indeed has for any a ∈ FR( , X, µ) an invariant, random d-coloring which is a factor of the action a. We do not know if this holds for groups with infinitely many ends.…”
Section: T Conley Et Almentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations