2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4979-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measured behaviors of an oversized irregular basement excavation and its surrounding responses in thick soft clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shanghai is located on the east side of China and the bedrock in Shanghai lies under thick Quaternary sediments. Hence, the main strata in Shanghai are soft silty clay and sandy clay [33]. Prior to the excavation of the tunnel, comprehensive in situ tests and laboratory experiments (e.g., cone penetration tests, boreholes, triaxial tests and oedometer tests) were conducted to investigate the surrounding and subsurface soil properties across the site.…”
Section: Geological Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shanghai is located on the east side of China and the bedrock in Shanghai lies under thick Quaternary sediments. Hence, the main strata in Shanghai are soft silty clay and sandy clay [33]. Prior to the excavation of the tunnel, comprehensive in situ tests and laboratory experiments (e.g., cone penetration tests, boreholes, triaxial tests and oedometer tests) were conducted to investigate the surrounding and subsurface soil properties across the site.…”
Section: Geological Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [18] reported on a massive 10.9-15.6 m deep, 70,500 m 2 irregular pit in Shanghai's soft clay, excavated using the bottom-up method and supported by auger cast-in-place pile walls and concrete struts. The key findings include: (1) the prolonged construction and large pit scale resulted in maximum wall deflection and ground subsidence exceeding 0.86% of the final excavation depth (H e ), significantly higher than other Shanghai excavations and surpassing allowable deformation limits; (2) basal heave displayed a dome-shaped pattern with minimal distortion between adjacent columns, but maximum distortion between columns and retaining walls neared the 0.2% limit; (3) significant axial force discrepancies were noted, with some axial forces in diagonal struts being 15% over the design value due to the spatial effects of internal supports; (4) the surrounding pipelines showed three-dimensional deformation and significant settlement, with a maximum of 56 mm.…”
Section: Large-scale Deep Excavationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, many literatures suggested that an experiential relationship existed between behaviors and potential geometric of the foundation pit, called data normalization processing. Several coupling relationships, between (1) the measured maximum wall deflection and excavation depth, (2) the depth where maximum wall deflection occurred and excavation depth, (3) the maximum wall deflection and the corresponding maximum ground settlement, and (4) the steel support stress and compression, are available in correlational studies [28,29]. e system is also capable to provide the operation interface to draw curves of multiple monitoring items based on the corresponding relationship.…”
Section: Curve Modeling Of Monitoring Datamentioning
confidence: 99%