1995
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00350-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measured magnetic moments of 21+ states in 190–198Pt and interacting boson model description of M1 systematics in the platinum isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement on the naturally occurring nuclide 192 Pt provided both a check of the experimental technique and a calibration of the effective hyperfine magnetic field strength. (The 2 1 1 state g factor and lifetime have been measured previously [2,3].) The 190 Pt experiment was discontinued once it was established that a more precise result would be obtained using the transient field technique with a target enriched to 4% in 190 Pt [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement on the naturally occurring nuclide 192 Pt provided both a check of the experimental technique and a calibration of the effective hyperfine magnetic field strength. (The 2 1 1 state g factor and lifetime have been measured previously [2,3].) The 190 Pt experiment was discontinued once it was established that a more precise result would be obtained using the transient field technique with a target enriched to 4% in 190 Pt [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of Coulomb excitation ensures that the angular correlations for 54,56,58 Fe are identical, well within the precision of the measurement. It has been demonstrated that the angular correlations in cases like the present work can be calculated at least as reliably as they can be measured [13][14][15][16][17]. The calculated angular correlations, which are effectively identical for all three isotopes, were therefore used in the following analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(See, for example, Refs. [24][25][26][27]; a more comprehensive list of references is given in Ref. [20].)…”
Section: A Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%