2020
DOI: 10.1017/s2040174420000926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measured weight in early pregnancy is a valid method for estimating pre-pregnancy weight

Abstract: Estimation of pre-pregnancy weight is difficult because measurements taken before pregnancy are rarely available. No studies have compared various ‘proxy’ measures using recalled weight or based on early pregnancy weight with actual measurements of pre-pregnancy weight. The Southampton Women’s Survey recruited women during 1998–2002 who were not pregnant. Data on 198 women with an estimated date of conception within 3 months of recruitment were analysed. Three proxy measures were considered: (1) recalled pre-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies confirmed that measured weight in early pregnancy provides a more accurate assessment of pre-pregnancy weight than recalled weight and avoids misclassification, underreporting of pre-pregnancy and delivery weight or over-reporting of GWG. 34,35 No difference in mean GWG was found between BMI classes. Still, because the IOM gives different recommendations for BMI groups and not all pregnant women may be aware of them, more than half of the participants did not meet the current guidelines.…”
Section: Health and Lifestyle Behaviormentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies confirmed that measured weight in early pregnancy provides a more accurate assessment of pre-pregnancy weight than recalled weight and avoids misclassification, underreporting of pre-pregnancy and delivery weight or over-reporting of GWG. 34,35 No difference in mean GWG was found between BMI classes. Still, because the IOM gives different recommendations for BMI groups and not all pregnant women may be aware of them, more than half of the participants did not meet the current guidelines.…”
Section: Health and Lifestyle Behaviormentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recent studies confirmed that measured weight in early pregnancy provides a more accurate assessment of pre-pregnancy weight than recalled weight and avoids misclassification, underreporting of pre-pregnancy and delivery weight or over-reporting of GWG. 34 , 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modest sample size in this in-vitro study limits the ability to study interactions between different clinical factors, and other demographic factors such as ethnicity and sex, and we are therefore unable to definitively determine whether DHA-lipids mediate links between maternal BMI or glycemia with birthweight. Consideration of the potential effects of pre-pregnancy BMI and total gestational weight gain were not possible due to the lack of data while noting that a measured weight in early pregnancy provides a more precise assessment of pre-pregnancy weight than recalled weight (Inskip 2020 ). Since participants were Chinese and Indian, findings may not be generalizable to other ethnicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight could introduce a recall bias but is widely used in research and allows comparison with other studies [ 8 , 48 ]. We consider the difference between the self-reported and measured weights at inclusion in the PGDM population (about 2 kilograms) to be plausible [ 49 , 50 ]. High BMI in our PGDM population hampered the ultrasound examination and reduced the success rate for the fetal flow measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%