2014 IEEE 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communication (PIMRC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2014.7136175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and analysis of NLOS identification metrics for WLAN systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the generalized likelihood ratio test algorithm is relatively simple to implement and can be adapted to a variety of signal models and statistical distributions, it is difficult to adjust and optimize it for uncertain or unknown signal distributions that can produce false positives and false alarms or which missed alarms in some specific cases. If the prior probability of LOS/NLOS propagation is unknown, NLOS propagation can be identified by testing whether the measurements obey a Gaussian distribution [28][29][30]. In recent years, tests such as K-S, A-D, chi-Square, gross test, skewness and cliffness tests have emerged [31][32][33].…”
Section: Root-mean-square Time Delay Extension Methods For Comparing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the generalized likelihood ratio test algorithm is relatively simple to implement and can be adapted to a variety of signal models and statistical distributions, it is difficult to adjust and optimize it for uncertain or unknown signal distributions that can produce false positives and false alarms or which missed alarms in some specific cases. If the prior probability of LOS/NLOS propagation is unknown, NLOS propagation can be identified by testing whether the measurements obey a Gaussian distribution [28][29][30]. In recent years, tests such as K-S, A-D, chi-Square, gross test, skewness and cliffness tests have emerged [31][32][33].…”
Section: Root-mean-square Time Delay Extension Methods For Comparing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define the NLOS scenario when the TOA error is greater than 0 Ts. In OFDM systems, some NLOS identification technologies [16,17] have already performed well. In this article we assume that the recognition result of NLOS is prior information, and let LOS status = 0, 1 where 1 indicates NLOS and 0 indicates LOS.…”
Section: Toa Error Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that NLOS state recognition algorithms based on distance estimation [ 7 , 8 , 9 ] and channel impulse response (CIR) features of UWB [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] are most commonly used to identify NLOS propagation state. However, compared with the CIR feature method, the distance estimation will cause extra delay due to the collection and calculation of distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%