2014
DOI: 10.1115/1.4027665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and Description of Three-Dimensional Shoulder Range of Motion With Degrees of Freedom Interactions

Abstract: The shoulder is the most mobile joint of the human body due to bony constraint scarcity and soft tissue function unlocking several degrees of freedom (DOF). Clinical evaluation of the shoulder range of motion (RoM) is often limited to a few monoplanar measurements where each DOF varies independently. The main objective of this study was to provide a method and its experimental approach to assess shoulder 3D RoM with DOF interactions. Sixteen participants performed four series of active arm movements with maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the radiation imposed by fluoroscopy limits the acquisition for each participant to about 30-s annually (Bey et al, 2008). Consequently, only dynamic arm flexion, scaption, abduction, and external rotation (Bey et al, 2008;Bishop et al, 2009;Giphart et al, 2013;Matsuki et al, 2012;Nishinaka et al, 2008) have been assessed to date, which represents a small fraction of the shoulder range-of-motion (ROM) comparatively to the total shoulder ROM (Haering et al, 2014;Veeger and van der Helm, 2007). In 2014, a method based on intracortical pins has permitted the measurement of glenohumeral translations during dynamic tasks with less than 0.15 mm error for one hour (Dal Maso et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the radiation imposed by fluoroscopy limits the acquisition for each participant to about 30-s annually (Bey et al, 2008). Consequently, only dynamic arm flexion, scaption, abduction, and external rotation (Bey et al, 2008;Bishop et al, 2009;Giphart et al, 2013;Matsuki et al, 2012;Nishinaka et al, 2008) have been assessed to date, which represents a small fraction of the shoulder range-of-motion (ROM) comparatively to the total shoulder ROM (Haering et al, 2014;Veeger and van der Helm, 2007). In 2014, a method based on intracortical pins has permitted the measurement of glenohumeral translations during dynamic tasks with less than 0.15 mm error for one hour (Dal Maso et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the range of motion should be assessed at multiple report the axial range of motion of the GHJ, showing that the range is dependent on the 58 elevation angle 17,37 , elevation plane 17,29,37 and form of motion (active and passive rotations) 29 . 59 However, these previous studies have not provided a comprehensive description of the 60 Axial rotations of the Glenohumeral joint 5 normal range of axial rotation of the GHJ during active and passive motion when the 61 humerus is positioned at multiple elevation angles and elevation planes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were seated during the protocol to allow the thorax to be restrained and humero- that could be achieved in the three elevation planes was 130° 17 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human shoulder is the joint complex with the highest range of motion (ROM) in the human body due to lack of bony constraints [9]. The dynamic nature of the surrounding musculature and the flexibility of ligaments impart kinematic and dynamic redundancy, facilitating necessary positioning of the human forearm and palm [12].…”
Section: Brief Functional Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these representations introduces geometric singularities in the arm-reachable workspace [8], resulting in ambiguity. Note that the three-angle system is reliable only if independent motions occur in cardinal planes [9]; otherwise, for non-cardinal plane motions, they serve as a crude approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%