Measurement and desert: Why grades cannot be deserved

Abstract

It is typically thought that a student deserves-or at least can deserve-a grade in a class. The students who perform well on assessments, who display a high degree of competence, and who complete all of the required work, deserve a good grade. Students who perform poorly on assessments, who fail to understand the course material, and who fail to complete the required work, deserve a bad grade. In this paper, I raise a challenge to this conventional view about grades. In particular, I challenge the idea that grades-understood appropriately-can be objects of desert for class performance. In other words, grades are simply not the kind of thing that can be deserved. The argument is roughly as follows. In general, when some property or quality of ours is measured, where that property or quality is something that makes us deserving of something, the measurement, itself, is not the thing that is or could be deserved. Grades, however, are a measure of student performance, where performance is meant to be the basis on which students deserve their grades. Since they are mere measures of performance, grades are not and could not be deserved on the basis of performance, and so are not possible objects of desert. Rather, they serve as evidence of the desert basis (academic performance, e.g.) that grounds a student's being deserving of other objects (praise or recognition, e.g.). In short, grades, at

Meritocracy, meritocratic education, and equality of opportunity

“…Toby Napoletano https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-4139 Notes 1. See Napoletano (2021) for an argument to the effect that grades are not among the objects that can be deserved. 2.…”

“… 1. See Napoletano (2021) for an argument to the effect that grades are not among the objects that can be deserved. …”