1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01289540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and folding-potential analysis of the elastic ?-scattering on light nuclei

Abstract: Dedicated to Professor Theo Mayer-Kuckuk on the occasion of his 60th birthday Differential cross sections of e-elastic scattering have been measured for the target nuclei XlB, 12C, 13C, 14N, lSN, and 160 at E=48.7 and 54.1 MeV and for the nuclei 170, 180, and 2~ at E=54.1 MeV. The experimental results were analysed in terms of the optical model using different complex potentials. Special emphasis is given to the application of the double-folding approach for the real part of the potential. The imaginary part i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
60
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential in line with those obtained for the A= 13-18 targets turns out to be completely unable to describe the backward rise seen in the Z~ ao) data: while the FM potential of Abele et al [14] nicely reproduces the A= 13-18 data, it completely fails to describe the Z~ angular distribution beyond 0em~--40 ~ This could have been expected from the absence of a pocket in the effective potential at the grazing angular momentum for potentials in line with the A= 13-18 potentials, if a mechanism similar to that found to be operative in 16 0 (a, ao) is sought to describe the Z~ anomaly. Indeed at lower energy (E, < 40 MeV) it has been shown [3] that the enhancement seen in 160(~, ao) at large angles is dominated by the internal wave contribution to the scattering amplitude, i.e.…”
Section: Optical Model Analysissupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A potential in line with those obtained for the A= 13-18 targets turns out to be completely unable to describe the backward rise seen in the Z~ ao) data: while the FM potential of Abele et al [14] nicely reproduces the A= 13-18 data, it completely fails to describe the Z~ angular distribution beyond 0em~--40 ~ This could have been expected from the absence of a pocket in the effective potential at the grazing angular momentum for potentials in line with the A= 13-18 potentials, if a mechanism similar to that found to be operative in 16 0 (a, ao) is sought to describe the Z~ anomaly. Indeed at lower energy (E, < 40 MeV) it has been shown [3] that the enhancement seen in 160(~, ao) at large angles is dominated by the internal wave contribution to the scattering amplitude, i.e.…”
Section: Optical Model Analysissupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This appears to be unattractive from a physical point of view, since potentials in line with those extracted at 54.1 MeV [14] are known, in the case of 160, to be smoothly connected with the unique potential fitting the higher energy data, and since on the other hand the few microscopic calculations devoted so far to the study of the isotope effect around target shell closure point to a slow and regular evolution with mass of the scattering properties of the sys- tem [16]. Despite these unsatisfactory features we attempted to analyze the 54.1 MeV data using deeper real potentials which would hopefully generate a substantial internal wave contribution at the considered energy.…”
Section: Optical Model Analysissupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [8] it was an experimental study of the elastic -scattering on some light nuclei with A = 11-24 at energies  -particles E = 48.7 and 54.1 MeV. Data were analyzed by different types of optical potential and including Michel type.…”
Section: Applications Of the Theory To The Scattering Of -Partimentioning
confidence: 99%