“…A potential in line with those obtained for the A= 13-18 targets turns out to be completely unable to describe the backward rise seen in the Z~ ao) data: while the FM potential of Abele et al [14] nicely reproduces the A= 13-18 data, it completely fails to describe the Z~ angular distribution beyond 0em~--40 ~ This could have been expected from the absence of a pocket in the effective potential at the grazing angular momentum for potentials in line with the A= 13-18 potentials, if a mechanism similar to that found to be operative in 16 0 (a, ao) is sought to describe the Z~ anomaly. Indeed at lower energy (E, < 40 MeV) it has been shown [3] that the enhancement seen in 160(~, ao) at large angles is dominated by the internal wave contribution to the scattering amplitude, i.e.…”