2019
DOI: 10.1126/science.aat2965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and implications of Saturn’s gravity field and ring mass

Abstract: The interior structure of Saturn, the depth of its winds, and the mass and age of its rings constrain its formation and evolution. In the final phase of the Cassini mission, the spacecraft dived between the planet and its innermost ring, at altitudes of 2600 to 3900 kilometers above the cloud tops. During six of these crossings, a radio link with Earth was monitored to determine the gravitational field of the planet and the mass of its rings. We find that Saturn’s gravity deviates from theoretical expectations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

30
334
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
30
334
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With a conservatively modified cloud‐level wind, extended to a depth of around 8,800 km, all the relevant gravity harmonics can be explained, taking into account the associated uncertainties in both the measurements and the model solutions. In most latitudes the optimal top level wind is similar to the observed wind, with the largest deviations found around latitudes 25–35 ∘ north and south, similar to the deviation found by Iess et al () but twice as small. This is a result of the different SB background density and gravity harmonics solutions used here, as discussed above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With a conservatively modified cloud‐level wind, extended to a depth of around 8,800 km, all the relevant gravity harmonics can be explained, taking into account the associated uncertainties in both the measurements and the model solutions. In most latitudes the optimal top level wind is similar to the observed wind, with the largest deviations found around latitudes 25–35 ∘ north and south, similar to the deviation found by Iess et al () but twice as small. This is a result of the different SB background density and gravity harmonics solutions used here, as discussed above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In most latitudes the wind solution is very similar to the observed cloud‐level wind and is well within the expected uncertainties discussed in section 1). The largest deviations are around latitudes 25–35 ∘ north and south, similar in location to the findings of Iess et al (), but about half the size. The wind decay profile and the resulting flow structure (Figures d and e) reveal that the wind behaves nearly barotropicly in the equatorial region (extending all the way to the equatorial plain in the direction of the spin axis) but baroclinicly outside latitudes 20 ∘ N and 20 ∘ S, that is, decaying before reaching the equatorial plain.…”
Section: The Wind Below the Cloud Levelsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In modeling the zonal‐circulation‐related distortion, several authors have employed the so‐called Thermal Wind Equation (TWE) for density ρ , gravity alignleft align-1 galign-2 and pressure p (Kaspi et al, 2018; Iess et al, 2019; Debras and Chabrier, 2019; Galanti et al, 2019),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%