Measurement and meaning of religiosity: A cross-cultural comparison of religiosity and charitable giving

Mathur, Anil

doi:10.1057/jt.2012.6

Cited by 31 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the measurement of religiosity is debatable, and several studies use modified versions to fit the specific contexts (Mathur, 2012). Although there some differences across studies on what factors constitute the religiosity index, the three most common aspects include religious affiliation (e.g.…”

Section: Selection Of Instrumental Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Youth Aspirations, Perceptions of Farming, and Migration Decisions in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Further Empirical Evidence From Ethiopia

Mussa

2020

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH (ZEF) was established in 1995 as an international, interdisciplinary research institute at the University of Bonn. Research and teaching at ZEF address political, economic and ecological development problems. ZEF closely cooperates with national and international partners in research and development organizations. For information, see: www.zef.de. ZEF -Discussion Papers on Development Policy are intended to stimulate discussion among researchers, practitioners and policy makers on current and emerging development issues. Each paper has been exposed to an internal discussion within the Center for Development Research (ZEF) and an external review. The papers mostly reflect work in progress. The Editorial Committee of the ZEF -DISCUSSION PAPERS ON DEVELOPMENT POLICY includes Joachim von Braun (Chair), Christian Borgemeister, and Eva Youkhana. Alisher Mirzabaev is the Managing Editor of the series.

show abstract

Section: Selection Of Instrumental Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Youth Aspirations, Perceptions of Farming, and Migration Decisions in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Further Empirical Evidence From Ethiopia

Mussa

2020

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some exceptions do exist though. Mathur [ 117 ] observed (partial) measurement invariance when comparing Indian and U.S. samples. This analysis was based on a six-item scale that claimed to reflect all three aforementioned religiosity components and nonetheless treated religiosity as a unidimensional construct [ 118 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As the answering format of the SBS supplies nine graded steps, we are not concerned about the approximation by normal theory (cf. [ 70 – 72 , 117 ]). CFA with ML estimation is relatively robust already when used with merely five ordinal response categories [ 120 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Cross-Cultural Supernatural Beliefs with Self- and Peer-Reports

Bluemke

Jong

Grevenstein³

et al. 2016

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite claims about the universality of religious belief, whether religiosity scales have the same meaning when administered inter-subjectively–or translated and applied cross-culturally–is currently unknown. Using the recent “Supernatural Belief Scale” (SBS), we present a primer on how to verify the strong assumptions of measurement invariance required in research on religion. A comparison of two independent samples, Croatians and New Zealanders, showed that, despite a sophisticated psychometric model, measurement invariance could be demonstrated for the SBS except for two noninvariant intercepts. We present a new approach for inspecting measurement invariance across self- and peer-reports as two dependent samples. Although supernatural beliefs may be hard to observe in others, the measurement model was fully invariant for Croatians and their nominated peers. The results not only establish, for the first time, a valid measure of religious supernatural belief across two groups of different language and culture, but also demonstrate a general invariance test for distinguishable dyad members nested within the same targets. More effort needs to be made to design and validate cross-culturally applicable measures of religiosity.

show abstract

“…Spiritual intelligence variable using the instrument adopted by the Tirri and Nokelainen (2008) one of the items the question is "I think is important about the meaning and purpose of life amid the bustle of everyday life" and "I often contemplate meaning and purpose to my life". The last variable is religiosity as moderation using the instrument adopted by the Mathur (2012) one of the items the question is "I am very religious" and "religion I profess very important for me".…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indicators of spiritual intelligence variable according to Kirsi Tirri et al (2006) there are four indicators with the item question number 4 statements: the ability of the circumstances, the ability to cope with everyday experience and the use of imagination, the ability to suppress as a measure of appreciation and ability feels securee, love and responsibility to others. Then the last variable is an indicator of religiosity by Mathur (2012) there are six indicators with the item question number 6 statement that attendance at places of worship, the importance of religious beliefs, the importance of religious values, believe in god, recognize religiosity, and their sense that their country could become a better place…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Religiosity as a Moderation of the Effect of Intellectual and Spiritual Quotient on Employee Performance

Noegroho

Wulansari

2020

MAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to examine and Determine the moderating effect of religiosity from the effect between intellectual intelligence and spiritual intelligence on the performance of employees of state-owned bank branches conventional Tegal. This study took a sample of 115 employees using a multi-stage type of probability sampling technique, the which is a combination of proportional sampling and random sampling techniques. Data collection method is done by distributing questionnaires. The method of data analysis uses descriptive statistical tests and SmartPLS 3.0 software. The results of this study intellectual intelligence that has a positive effect on employee performance. Likewise, with spiritual intelligence has a positive effect on employee performance. In the moderation test, religiosity is not Able to moderate the relationship of intellectual intelligence on employee performance religiosity meaning that weakens the relationship, hypothesis 3 is rejected. Then, religiosity is Able to Strengthen the relationship of spiritual intelligence on employee performance hypothesis 4 is accepted meaning. Suggestions from this study, employees of conventional state-owned bank branch offices in Tegal city are expected to be Able to empower Reviews their intelligence in order to be Able to improve the level of performance in accordance with the company’s standards and for the management of conventional state -owned bank branch offices in Tegal city always provide motivation and establish communication with employees so that employees continue to maintain intellectual intelligence and spiritual intelligence in the work environment.

show abstract

Measurement and meaning of religiosity: A cross-cultural comparison of religiosity and charitable giving

Cited by 31 publications

References 23 publications

Youth Aspirations, Perceptions of Farming, and Migration Decisions in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Further Empirical Evidence From Ethiopia

Youth Aspirations, Perceptions of Farming, and Migration Decisions in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Further Empirical Evidence From Ethiopia

Measuring Cross-Cultural Supernatural Beliefs with Self- and Peer-Reports

Religiosity as a Moderation of the Effect of Intellectual and Spiritual Quotient on Employee Performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About