2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2005.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and modeling of densities and sound velocities of the systems {poly(propylene glycol)+methanol, +ethanol, +1-propanol, +2-propanol and +1-butanol} at T=298.15K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purity of the solvents was assessed by a comparison of the experimental density, speed of sound and refractive index with literature values at T = 298.15 K and are given in table 1. Densities, speed of sound, and refractive indices of all of the chemicals at T = 298.15 K have a good agreement with the corresponding literature values [1,2,4,6,[9][10][11]13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The purity of the solvents was assessed by a comparison of the experimental density, speed of sound and refractive index with literature values at T = 298.15 K and are given in table 1. Densities, speed of sound, and refractive indices of all of the chemicals at T = 298.15 K have a good agreement with the corresponding literature values [1,2,4,6,[9][10][11]13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Details of the experimental setup and measuring procedure have been given elsewhere [24]. The temperature was automatically kept constant with an accuracy of 0.001 K. The apparatus was also tested with the density of a known molality of aqueous NaCl using the data given by Pitzer et al [25].…”
Section: Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each alcohol should be found a few collection of poor quality an anomalous trend in density ( [91] for methanol; [102] for ethanol; [78,95,102,111] for propan-1-ol; [95,111,121] for butan-1-ol; [109] for 2-methyl-propan-1-ol and for 2methyl-propan-2-ol; [112,144] for pentan-1-ol) and in ultrasonic velocity ( [95,98] for methanol; [78] for butan-1-ol; [109;124] for butan-2-ol; [109] for 2-methylpropan-1-ol; [109] for 2-methyl-propan-2-ol). Wilhoit and Zwolinski, 1973), (, Lange, 1973), (▲, Weast, 1974), ( ,--, Hales and Ellender, 1976), (,-• -, Diaz-Peña and Tardajos, 1979), (, Won et al, 1981), (,•••, Ortega, 1982), (,-• -, Rauf et al, 1983), ( , Munster et al, 1984) , ( ,--, Riddick et al, 1986), (, --, Garcia, 1991) Sakurai et al, 1988), (▲, Park et al, 1994), (,--, Aminabhavi and Gopalakrishna, 1995), (, DIPPR, 2000), ( , Tu et al, 2001), (, Gonzalez et al, 2002), (,-• • -, Aralaguppi and Baragi, 2006), (, Gonzalez et al, 2006a), (,•••, Gonzalez et al, 2006c), ( , Zafarani-Moattar et al, 2006), (,…”
Section: Comparison With Open Literature Datamentioning
confidence: 99%