2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and simulation of climate inside Almer�a-type greenhouses using computational fluid dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Corp., Bourne, MA, USA) placed at heights of 1 and 2 m. These fixed devices allowed temperature measurement in a range of -40°C to 70°C with an accuracy of ± 0.18°C. They were all programmed to register data at 0.5 Hz and were protected against direct solar radiation with passive solar radiation open boxes, allowing natural air movement around the sensors (Molina-Aiz et al, 2004). From the data of inside humidity we can obtain the specific humidity q and correct the sonic anemometer temperature T s using the following expression :…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corp., Bourne, MA, USA) placed at heights of 1 and 2 m. These fixed devices allowed temperature measurement in a range of -40°C to 70°C with an accuracy of ± 0.18°C. They were all programmed to register data at 0.5 Hz and were protected against direct solar radiation with passive solar radiation open boxes, allowing natural air movement around the sensors (Molina-Aiz et al, 2004). From the data of inside humidity we can obtain the specific humidity q and correct the sonic anemometer temperature T s using the following expression :…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires extremely hermetic greenhouse structures to ensure that all incoming air passes through the evaporative pads along part or the whole of the side wall, with powerful extractor fans being placed along the opposite wall to provide the required suction ( Figure 1). The Almería-type greenhouse [7], which accounts for 94.7% of the greenhouse area in southeast Spain, is not hermetic, and as a result growers have opted for the installation of the fog system, which is better suited to such structures [8]. According to López et al [6], in a greenhouse equipped with evaporative pads a difference in temperature of up to 11.6 °C was recorded with respect to a naturally ventilated greenhouse, whereas using the fog system this difference was 10.4 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portanto, nem mesmo a instabilidade atmosférica, oriunda da aproximação das frentes frias durante o período experimental, foi capaz de intensificar o movimento do ar no interior da casa de vegetação. Resultados semelhantes, relacionados a baixos valores de velocidade do ar em ambientes protegidos, também foram relatados por Wang et al (1999), Boulard et al (2004), Molina-Aiz et al (2004) e Bartzanas et al (2005).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…ou valores extremamente baixos, como os observados em ambiente protegido (Wang et al, 1999;Boulard et al, 2004;Molina-Aiz et al, 2004;Bartzanas et al, 2005). Com a utilização do fator de desacoplamento, é importante observar que a velocidade do ar não é mais necessária para a estimativa do termo r a .…”
Section: Penman-monteith Modificado Para Ambientes Protegidos (Pmap)unclassified