1989
DOI: 10.1109/22.44098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and simulation of memory effects in predistortion linearizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported in literature that the nonlinearity due to software program and hardware system of the instrument are deteriorate the measurement results [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported in literature that the nonlinearity due to software program and hardware system of the instrument are deteriorate the measurement results [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models are valid when the device Òmemory timeÓ (amplitude-and frequency-dependent time delay between the transmitted and received RF signal) is much smaller than the reciprocal of the input signal bandwidth [16]. In other words, these characteristics can be used only when the nonlinear system is treated as a quasi-memoryless system [17]. As a rule of thumb, the AM-AM/PM models are used when the memory of the nonlinear system is at least twice less than the reciprocal of the envelope frequency [16,18].…”
Section: B Optical Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most evident nonlinear behavior is the gain compression that occurs when the PA is driven at higher power levels. Besides, different kinds of dynamic effects are also observable, including low-frequency memory effects (on the order of the envelope bandwidth) associated to active-device self-heating, biasing circuitry and trapping effects [17,18], as well as high-frequency memory effects (on the order of the carrier frequency) attributed to non-uniform frequency response of the matching networks [6].…”
Section: Power Amplifier Behavioral Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%